04.08.2016 Views

Torrance Journal for Applied Creativity

TorranceJournal_V1

TorranceJournal_V1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Over the years, a body of<br />

literature has grown around the topic<br />

of creative learning. This research<br />

emerged in the fields of gifted education,<br />

creativity, and psychology, and<br />

crosses international borders. Researchers<br />

and practitioners in the United<br />

Kingdom have worked to summarily<br />

define the paradigm (Craft, Cremin,<br />

Burnard, & Chappell, 2007; Jeffrey &<br />

Craft, 2004). Studying this work, we<br />

arrive at four central tenets of a creative<br />

learning paradigm:<br />

Level Three Learning in the Classroom<br />

In 1990, <strong>Torrance</strong> and Goff wrote, “Wise teachers offer a curriculum with<br />

plenty of opportunities <strong>for</strong> creative behaviors. They can make assignments that call<br />

<strong>for</strong> original work, independent learning, self-initiated projects, and experimentation”<br />

(ERIC No. ED321489). But how to do this when there’s a set curriculum, standards<br />

to meet, and days upon days of testing? The good news is that even within the confines<br />

of a predetermined program, teachers can ignite creative learning by tweaking<br />

the questions they ask.<br />

creativity is integrated with<br />

academic content teaching<br />

and learning, which causes<br />

learning to be meaningful<br />

to students and<br />

drives their motivation<br />

intrinsically,<br />

resulting in new ideas,<br />

skills, or personal growth<br />

(Haydon, 2015; Jeffrey,<br />

2006).<br />

Why is creative learning important?<br />

Scottish researchers recently<br />

undertook a literature review of several<br />

hundred articles to find out what the<br />

research says. “Empirical studies<br />

included in the review demonstrated<br />

that creative learning led to improved<br />

academic achievement; increased confidence<br />

and resilience; enhanced motivation<br />

and engagement; development of<br />

social, emotional and thinking skills;<br />

and improved school attendance” (Davies,<br />

Jindal-Snape, Collier, Digby, Hay,<br />

& Howe, 2013; Haydon, 2015). On<br />

review, creative learning seems to solve<br />

many of the problems that we face in<br />

our schools. So, how do we achieve it?<br />

In their original 1990 article, <strong>Torrance</strong><br />

and Goff provided an easy pathway <strong>for</strong><br />

teachers. Here, we update and expand<br />

on this approach <strong>for</strong> easy implementation,<br />

even under the stresses and<br />

pressures that exist <strong>for</strong> today’s teachers.<br />

Please refer to the chart entitled <strong>Torrance</strong> Learning Model. The goal of creative<br />

learning is to replace Level 1 questions that require only recognition and memorization<br />

with Level 3 questions. Level 3 questions ask students to imagine, experiment<br />

with ideas, discover, elaborate, test their ideas within context, and communicate their<br />

discoveries. The goal is not to start with Level 1 and move in progression up the ladder.<br />

Level 2 is included to clarify that a compare and contrast question of this nature<br />

is still not a Level 3 question such as you see here. The ideal chart, instead, looks like<br />

the abridged <strong>Torrance</strong> Learning Model chart pictured, showing the preferred pathway:<br />

Level 3 usurps Levels 1 and 2.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!