12.12.2016 Views

ENFORCEMENT

eop_ipec_jointstrategicplan_hi-res

eop_ipec_jointstrategicplan_hi-res

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Office of the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator<br />

legitimate payment processing services and engage<br />

in counterfeiting and infringement in the rapidly<br />

evolving online environment. Expanded collaboration,<br />

for example by geographic scope, and enhanced<br />

transparency (including sharing with the public<br />

generalized, anonymized data on the nature and profile<br />

of merchant accounts terminated by payment processors<br />

for violating the Terms of Service for counterfeiting<br />

and infringement), will improve benchmarking of these<br />

voluntary initiatives and enable stakeholders to identify<br />

further opportunities to deny criminals financial support.<br />

ACTION NO. 2.3: Encourage benchmarking<br />

studies to gauge and strengthen voluntary best<br />

practice initiatives. IPEC and USPTO, with private<br />

sector input, will facilitate benchmarking studies<br />

of current voluntary initiatives designed to combat<br />

revenue flow to rogue sites to determine whether<br />

existing voluntary initiatives are functioning<br />

effectively, and thereby promote a robust, datadriven<br />

voluntary initiative environment.<br />

2. Strengthen Online Advertising Networks’<br />

Efforts to Curb Flow of Illicit Revenue.<br />

ACTION NO. 2.1: Support efforts to enhance<br />

payment processor voluntary initiatives. IPEC—as<br />

well as members of the U.S. Interagency Strategic<br />

Planning Committees on IP Enforcement—will<br />

consider opportunities to further engage with the<br />

voluntary payment processor initiatives currently<br />

in place, including with regard to the number of<br />

active participants in, and geographic scope of,<br />

the initiatives and best practices. Consideration<br />

will be given to multistakeholder engagement with<br />

the private sector, public interest organizations,<br />

academia, and bi-lateral engagements with other<br />

governments to understand the expansion of<br />

these voluntary initiatives’ application in other<br />

countries, and other tools to support and expand<br />

these voluntary agreements designed to cut-off<br />

worldwide funding to illicit merchants.<br />

ACTION NO. 2.2: Encourage enhanced<br />

transparency in the operation and effectiveness<br />

of the private-sector-led voluntary initiatives<br />

to combat revenue flow to online commercial<br />

pirates and commercial-scale traders of<br />

counterfeit goods. Payment processors are<br />

encouraged to make appropriately generalized<br />

and anonymized data publicly available as part of<br />

their best practices and initiatives to permit study<br />

and analysis of illicit activity intercepted on their<br />

networks. Such data will allow study by public and<br />

private actors alike to identify patterns of behavior<br />

or tactics associated with illicit merchants. IPEC,<br />

along with members of the U.S. Interagency<br />

Strategic Planning Committees on IP Enforcement,<br />

will identify means to enhance data-driven research<br />

opportunities in the area of illicit online financing<br />

trends, tactics, and characteristics.<br />

The unlawful exploitation of copyrighted material is<br />

substantially financed by advertising dollars. As one<br />

report stated: “Ad revenue is the oxygen that allows<br />

content theft to breathe.” 15 Ad-supported piracy is<br />

extensive. According to one report, online advertising<br />

supports up to 86 percent of IP infringing websites<br />

that allow web users to download or stream infringing<br />

content for free to the end-user. 16<br />

Whereas the rogue website operator pays nothing for<br />

a downloaded or streamed movie or song, for example,<br />

the ads that appear beside the misappropriated content<br />

generate revenue for the website operator—generally<br />

in the form of pure profit. The artist, label, and studio<br />

do not see a penny. The ad network that delivered ads<br />

to the website dedicated to offering infringing content<br />

also generates revenue (FIG. 33), while again, the artist,<br />

label and studio receive no compensation for their work.<br />

Everyone profits, except the creator and/or authorized<br />

distributor of the original content.<br />

FIG. 33: Example of “Pay Per Click” (PPC) Ad Flow in a<br />

Piracy Model.<br />

SECTION 2<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!