09.12.2012 Views

Fundamental Food Microbiology, Third Edition - Fuad Fathir

Fundamental Food Microbiology, Third Edition - Fuad Fathir

Fundamental Food Microbiology, Third Edition - Fuad Fathir

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IMPORTANT FACTS IN FOODBORNE DISEASES 325<br />

The incidence of foodborne diseases of microbial origin is higher than that for all<br />

others causes combined. In the U.S., between 1972 and 1978, among the total number<br />

of cases reported of foodborne disease outbreaks, pathogenic microorganisms caused<br />

94.4%, and only 1.1% and 4.3% were caused by parasites and chemicals, respectively.<br />

Even at present, the occurrences of foodborne diseases caused by pathogenic<br />

microorganisms far exceed those by all others combined. In recent years, foodborne<br />

diseases of microbial origin have become the primary food safety concern among<br />

U.S. consumers and regulatory agencies. This trend is probably true in most other<br />

developed and developing countries. 1<br />

\<br />

III. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL ASPECTS<br />

A. Investigation of a <strong>Food</strong>borne Disease<br />

In general, various regulatory agencies at the local, state, and national levels are<br />

empowered with the responsibility of investigating the cause of a reported foodborne<br />

disease (see Appendix C). In the U.S., the regulatory agencies involved in the<br />

investigation of a foodborne disease are the local health department; state health,<br />

food, and agriculture departments; the federal <strong>Food</strong> and Drug Administration (FDA);<br />

U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention<br />

(CDC); and several others. Initially, a medical doctor who suspects a patient to have<br />

a foodborne disease informs the local or state health officials about the incident.<br />

These agencies, following a preliminary investigation and recognizing the cause to<br />

be of food origin, report the incident to the appropriate federal agencies, which then<br />

conduct an epidemiological investigation. The investigation at the state and federal<br />

levels involves examination of the suspected foods, environmental samples, and<br />

materials obtained from the patients for pathogens, microbial and nonmicrobial<br />

toxins, and chemicals. Results of these tests provide direct evidence of the association<br />

of an agent (e.g., pathogen, toxin, parasite, chemicals) with the disease. In addition<br />

to testing suspected samples, both the sick and other people who consumed the same<br />

food from the same source are interviewed to establish an indirect association of<br />

the most likely foods with the disease. This information is collected, recorded, and<br />

reported by the CDC, Atlanta, GA. (See Section IV of this chapter.)<br />

B. <strong>Food</strong>borne Disease Outbreak<br />

In the U.S., the federal regulatory agencies define a foodborne disease as an outbreak<br />

when two or more people become sick with a similar illness (symptoms) from the<br />

consumption of the same food from the same source, and the epidemiological<br />

investigations implicate, either directly or indirectly, the same food from the same<br />

source as the cause of the illness. However, in the case of botulism, because of a<br />

high fatality rate, even when only one person has the illness, it is considered an<br />

outbreak. For chemical poisoning too, even a single case is considered an outbreak.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!