Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
382 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES<br />
Series 4, Volume 63, No. 12<br />
4. Size larger (BL = 4.5-4.7 mm); pronotum less transverse (ratio Pw/PL = 1.40), with anterior<br />
transverse impression indistinct; elytra broad, disc slightly flattened (TengchongCounty). . .<br />
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T. mingguangensis sp. nov.<br />
Size smaller (BL = 4.0 to 4.2 mm); pronotum more transverse (ratio Pw/PL = 1.44 to 1.46),<br />
with anterior transverse impression distinct; elytra ovoid, disc convex, not at all flattened . 5<br />
5. Elytra with discal striae very distinctly punctate and slight attenuated toward elytral apex;<br />
pronotum with basal foveae deep, distinct (GongshanCounty). . . . . . . . T. qiqiensis sp. nov.<br />
Elytra with discal striae only faintly punctate and not attenuated toward elytral apex; pronotum<br />
with basal foveae shallow, less well defined (FugongCounty). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T. pseudoqiqiensis sp. nov.<br />
6. Size larger (BL = 3.7-3.8 mm), elytra with lateral discal striae more shallowly impressed but<br />
still clearly evident (LushuiCounty) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T. luzhangensis sp. nov.<br />
Size smaller (BL = 3.3-3.5 mm); elytra with discal striae 6 and 7 effaced, faintly or not at all<br />
evident . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7<br />
7. Tempora only slightly convex (GongshanCounty) (Fig. 23a) . . . . T. gongshanensis sp. nov.<br />
Tempora markedly convex (FugongCounty) (Fig. 24a) . . . . . . . . . . . . T. shibalicus sp. nov.<br />
Trechus (Trechus) indicus Putzeys, 1870<br />
(Figs. 16b, 17, 41a, 44, 45–48)<br />
Trechus indicus Putzeys, 1870:175. Holotype, lost (see Jeannel 1923, footnote p. 416). Type locality: eastern<br />
India.<br />
Trechus (s.str.) indicus Putzeys: Jeannel, 1927:157, 158 (in part)<br />
Trechus (s.str.) macrops Jeannel, 1927:157, 160 (in part). Type locality: China, Yunnan. Synonymized by<br />
Jeannel (1935: 275).<br />
Trechus macrops Jeannel: Andrewes, 1935 63, 67.<br />
Trechus indicus Putzeys: Jeannel, 1935:275.<br />
Trechus indicus Putzeys: Deuve, 1988:80.<br />
Trechus (s.str.) indicus Putzeys: Uéno 1977:181.<br />
Trechus (s.str.) macrops Jeannel: Uéno & Yin, 1993:354. These authors considered T.macrops as a distinct<br />
species.<br />
DIAGNOSIS.— Adults of this species (Fig. 17a) can be distinguished from those of all other<br />
species in the region by the following combination of character states: size large for genus (BL =<br />
4.2 to 5.0 mm); fully-winged; eyes markedly large, tempora very short, joined to neck region at<br />
nearly a right angle; frontal furrows angulate at midlength; right mandible as in Fig. 16b; mentum<br />
and submentum not fused; mentum with medial tooth simple, triangular; antennae with antennomeres<br />
3 and 4 subequal in length, antennomere 2 slightly shorter; pronotum transverse (ratio<br />
Pw/PL = 1.43), with lateral margins not sinuate posteriorly, straight just anterior to basal angles,<br />
the latter small and rectangular, lateral explanation very wide basally, basal margin slightly convex<br />
medally; elytra oblong, lateral discal striae effaced, only the medial four or five striae distinctly<br />
impressed, recurrent stria markedly impressed; preapical seta absent or vestigial, two discal setae<br />
present, inserted in stria 3 at anterior one-fifth and at middle, respectively; median lobe of male<br />
aedeagus (Fig. 17b) not arcuate, with apex slender, ventrally hooked, endophallus with two elongate,<br />
projecting sclerites, one apically tapered, the other apically lobate.<br />
COMMENTS.— Uéno (1977:182) correctly pointed out that this widely distributed species, with<br />
members fully-winged, is morphologically varied across its range. In particular, the preapical seta