JNF-The-Working-Class-Struggle-of-Half-a-Century
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Meeting place <strong>of</strong> the Legislative Council (postcard by A. Moure Losada)<br />
Debate<br />
All <strong>of</strong> the un<strong>of</strong>ficial members took part in the debate. Three <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />
also expressed their views; at least one <strong>of</strong> these strongly supported the<br />
proposal. One un<strong>of</strong>ficial member endeavoured to enlighten the Council,<br />
which was in committee stage, on the report <strong>of</strong> the Closer Union<br />
Commission with special reference to recommendations made to settle<br />
conflicting claims with the Executive Council, but the contention was<br />
not relevant to the issue. Another un<strong>of</strong>ficial compared the relation or<br />
the argument <strong>of</strong> his colleague to the subject before the house with a<br />
railway train which ran <strong>of</strong>f the tract. <strong>The</strong> mover and seconder <strong>of</strong> the<br />
resolution argued for the right to vote forcefully and with brilliance.<br />
Three other members spoke against the resolution. One said his<br />
reason was that the present was not the time for the introducing any<br />
change in the constitution and that <strong>of</strong> the Government was working satisfactorily.<br />
<strong>The</strong> second member did not contribute much to the debate.<br />
<strong>The</strong> address <strong>of</strong> the third was as follows; Mr. Chairman, Gentlemen.<br />
You have listened to speakers who support the resolution and I am now<br />
going to say a few words against its adoption. When the matter was first<br />
considered by the Honourable Members <strong>of</strong> Council we were unaware <strong>of</strong><br />
the strong opposition to its adoption that existed.<br />
Today, however, there is evidence that a great number <strong>of</strong> people<br />
are opposed to the introduction <strong>of</strong> the elective principle at this time.<br />
It has been our duty to examine the status <strong>of</strong> those who urge adoption <strong>of</strong><br />
the resolution in favour <strong>of</strong> the elective principle and also those who<br />
asked for its rejection.<br />
Are those who clamour for an elective system men <strong>of</strong> substance<br />
with a stake in the community or are they men <strong>of</strong> straw? With some notable<br />
exceptions they belong to the latter category. And who are those<br />
responsible for its rejection? Many are the descendants <strong>of</strong> those who<br />
themselves are primarily responsible for the unique position <strong>of</strong> prosperity<br />
in which this Island find itself Today. It is true that they do not disturb<br />
the quiet <strong>of</strong> the countryside by the beating <strong>of</strong> the drums, but they<br />
love the people <strong>of</strong> the Island nevertheless. If the methods that have been<br />
92