01.01.2018 Views

JNF-The-Working-Class-Struggle-of-Half-a-Century

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Meeting place <strong>of</strong> the Legislative Council (postcard by A. Moure Losada)<br />

Debate<br />

All <strong>of</strong> the un<strong>of</strong>ficial members took part in the debate. Three <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />

also expressed their views; at least one <strong>of</strong> these strongly supported the<br />

proposal. One un<strong>of</strong>ficial member endeavoured to enlighten the Council,<br />

which was in committee stage, on the report <strong>of</strong> the Closer Union<br />

Commission with special reference to recommendations made to settle<br />

conflicting claims with the Executive Council, but the contention was<br />

not relevant to the issue. Another un<strong>of</strong>ficial compared the relation or<br />

the argument <strong>of</strong> his colleague to the subject before the house with a<br />

railway train which ran <strong>of</strong>f the tract. <strong>The</strong> mover and seconder <strong>of</strong> the<br />

resolution argued for the right to vote forcefully and with brilliance.<br />

Three other members spoke against the resolution. One said his<br />

reason was that the present was not the time for the introducing any<br />

change in the constitution and that <strong>of</strong> the Government was working satisfactorily.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second member did not contribute much to the debate.<br />

<strong>The</strong> address <strong>of</strong> the third was as follows; Mr. Chairman, Gentlemen.<br />

You have listened to speakers who support the resolution and I am now<br />

going to say a few words against its adoption. When the matter was first<br />

considered by the Honourable Members <strong>of</strong> Council we were unaware <strong>of</strong><br />

the strong opposition to its adoption that existed.<br />

Today, however, there is evidence that a great number <strong>of</strong> people<br />

are opposed to the introduction <strong>of</strong> the elective principle at this time.<br />

It has been our duty to examine the status <strong>of</strong> those who urge adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

the resolution in favour <strong>of</strong> the elective principle and also those who<br />

asked for its rejection.<br />

Are those who clamour for an elective system men <strong>of</strong> substance<br />

with a stake in the community or are they men <strong>of</strong> straw? With some notable<br />

exceptions they belong to the latter category. And who are those<br />

responsible for its rejection? Many are the descendants <strong>of</strong> those who<br />

themselves are primarily responsible for the unique position <strong>of</strong> prosperity<br />

in which this Island find itself Today. It is true that they do not disturb<br />

the quiet <strong>of</strong> the countryside by the beating <strong>of</strong> the drums, but they<br />

love the people <strong>of</strong> the Island nevertheless. If the methods that have been<br />

92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!