JNF-The-Working-Class-Struggle-of-Half-a-Century
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
whether it was a fact that the St. Kitts Sugar Industry had been generously<br />
assisted by preferential tariff for many years. He then went on: If<br />
the reply to Question one is in the affirmative, is it a fact that the annual<br />
cash value <strong>of</strong> the preference enjoyed by St. Kitts Sugar Industry substantially<br />
exceeds the cost <strong>of</strong> administration and expenditure in this<br />
Presidency, to what extent?<br />
<strong>The</strong> answer came at the next meeting held on October 20. It<br />
stated that the colonial sugar industry as a whole and had been given the<br />
benefit <strong>of</strong> a preferential duty in the United Kingdom and Canada for<br />
many years. <strong>The</strong> reply went on give the tonnage <strong>of</strong> sugar exported for 5<br />
years beginning 1932, and other relevant figures. In that year 19 327<br />
tons were exported. Calculating the figure at five pounds per ton preference,<br />
the industry enjoyed the value <strong>of</strong> $463 848, while Government<br />
expenditure for that year was $404 400. <strong>The</strong> preference thus exceeded<br />
the cost <strong>of</strong> administration and expenditure by $59 448. In 1934 when<br />
27 615 tons <strong>of</strong> sugar were exported, the preference exceeded Government<br />
expenditure by $217 075. It was made clear that the preference<br />
obtained by the industry was the difference between the duty imposed<br />
in the United Kingdom and in Canada on sugar imported from Dominions<br />
and Colonies, and the duty on sugar imported from foreign countries.<br />
On the heels <strong>of</strong> this reply, Mr. Manchester followed with another<br />
question. It read: Is Government aware <strong>of</strong> the fact the rates <strong>of</strong><br />
wage paid to agricultural labourers connected with the sugar industry<br />
have remained the same during the past six years and that wages paid<br />
today are the same as those paid in 1931, the pre-preferential period?<br />
<strong>The</strong> Head <strong>of</strong> the Government must have felt uneasy. <strong>The</strong> conscience <strong>of</strong><br />
the captains <strong>of</strong> industry and the moral sense <strong>of</strong> ruling authorities, as it<br />
were, found themselves in the iron jaws <strong>of</strong> the powerful vice. <strong>The</strong> answer<br />
sounded hollow. It pointed to the hand <strong>of</strong> the factory with the lion<br />
share <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>its but could not say that the workers were not badly<br />
squeezed. <strong>The</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial reply was as follows, <strong>The</strong> Government is aware<br />
that the rates <strong>of</strong> wages paid to agricultural labourers have not been<br />
increased generally during the past six years. During the last three<br />
years, however, estates, have paid to their labourers a bonus amounting<br />
approximately to one-third <strong>of</strong> the deferred payment made by the Sugar<br />
139