JNF-The-Working-Class-Struggle-of-Half-a-Century
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
provided the major portion <strong>of</strong> the employment in St. Kitts. As late as<br />
the nineteen thirties the rate paid to some sugar factory workers was one<br />
shilling per twelve-hour day - one penny per hour. <strong>The</strong> rate paid to estate<br />
workers was invariable one half <strong>of</strong> that - six pence per day - one<br />
cent per hour. <strong>The</strong>re was nothing known as overtime pay for work done<br />
beyond normal working hours.<br />
So the lot fell to organised Labour under the leadership <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Workers League to seek the means <strong>of</strong> throwing <strong>of</strong>f the yoke <strong>of</strong> exploitation.<br />
In the struggle, the League got the support <strong>of</strong> other progressive<br />
groups in neighboring islands. <strong>The</strong> first fruit came forth in December<br />
1937 when the Labour (Minimum Wage) Act was passed in the Leeward<br />
Island. This law provided that whenever the Government finds it necessary<br />
steps should be taken to regulate the wages paid in any occupation<br />
in the territory. Conditions <strong>of</strong> employment would have be investigated<br />
with a view to fixing minimum wages which should be payable. <strong>The</strong><br />
investigation was to be done by an advisory committee which was to<br />
include representative <strong>of</strong> employers and workers.<br />
After considering the committee’s recommendations, the Government<br />
would make an order setting out the lowest (minimum) rates <strong>of</strong><br />
wages payable. <strong>The</strong>se could be in the form <strong>of</strong> time-rates, piece-rates or<br />
overtime rates. <strong>The</strong>re was nothing within the law to prevent an employer<br />
paying more than the minimum rate to a worker. Often an employer,<br />
when pleased with the quality <strong>of</strong> service given, rewarded the<br />
worker with a ”merit increase” <strong>of</strong> pay as a token <strong>of</strong> appreciation. This<br />
also encouraged the worker to improve his or her standard <strong>of</strong> service<br />
where possible.<br />
However it became an <strong>of</strong>fence for an employer to pay less than<br />
the minimum rate fixed by regulation. Every such employer was required<br />
to keep records <strong>of</strong> wages paid to show that the law was complied<br />
with. <strong>The</strong> burden was on him to prove that he had not paid less than the<br />
minimum rate. <strong>The</strong> Act provided for the appointment <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers to investigate<br />
complaints and otherwise to see that the law was carried out.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se <strong>of</strong>ficers were empowered to enter premises, inspect and examine<br />
wages sheet or other records. Penalties were prescribed for any person<br />
who hindered or molested such <strong>of</strong>ficers in the performance <strong>of</strong> their duty<br />
165