01.03.2018 Views

Could Not Answer

It is a translation of (Cevap Veremedi) into English. Harputlu Ishâk Effendi explains how the Bible - the true book revealed to Isa 'alaihis-salam - was distorted; how words that belonged to people were put into firstly written four Gospels; that the theory of trinity is erroneous; the belief of Tawhid (the unity of Allahu ta’ala) in Islam. Besides, a few very precious letters - a food of a soul by Muhammad Ma’sûm-î Fârûkî - take place. Information about Judaism, Torah and Talmud is also given.

It is a translation of (Cevap Veremedi) into English. Harputlu Ishâk Effendi explains how the Bible - the true book revealed to Isa 'alaihis-salam - was distorted; how words that belonged to people were put into firstly written four Gospels; that the theory of trinity is erroneous; the belief of Tawhid (the unity of Allahu ta’ala) in Islam. Besides, a few very precious letters - a food of a soul by Muhammad Ma’sûm-î Fârûkî - take place. Information about Judaism, Torah and Talmud is also given.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

impossible, so it is impossible for a god to be incapable or of<br />

recent occurrence. For a god’s incapability would be possible only<br />

if he lost his power which he had had in eternity. And this, in its<br />

turn, would mean his losing his being eternal. If it were impossible<br />

for the other god to will that Zeyd should sit down, this would<br />

mean that one of them outacted the other’s will, which, in turn,<br />

would mean the other’s incapability. And he who is incapable<br />

could not be a god.<br />

The word (fî-himâ) in the twenty-second âyat of Enbiyâ sura,<br />

which we have quoted above, denotes the effects of two gods. And<br />

this is a definitely authentic documentary evidence for the fact that<br />

there could not be two gods. Sa’d-ud-dîn Teftâzânî [1]<br />

‘rahimahullah’ stated, “This âyat-i-kerîma is a convincing<br />

document, and an evidence that anyone will understand clearly,<br />

concerning the fact that there could not be two gods.”<br />

As will be understood from what we have said so far, Allâhu<br />

ta’âlâ is the Creator, the only One worthy of being worshipped, of<br />

all the existence, and He has no partner or likeness. Ancient<br />

Greek philosophers stated some ten evidences in order to prove<br />

that Allâhu ta’âlâ is one. The ’Ulamâ of Kelâm, by using the<br />

method termed innî (categorical, or a posteriori, or from effects to<br />

causes, argument), infer the cause from the effect. The Hukemâ,<br />

on the other hand, use the method called limmî, that is, see the<br />

power of the cause, and deduce that this power is the cause of all<br />

beings. [Limmî means ‘with limma’ (in Arabic), that is, ‘with (the<br />

interrogative) why’. And innî means ‘with inna (categorically<br />

so)’.]<br />

Beings existing in the universe cannot come into existence or<br />

cease to exist from themselves. There is a being who effects,<br />

creates them. Since there are worlds, and creatures in these worlds,<br />

there is a being who creates these worlds and the creatures in these<br />

worlds. Existence of creatures is an evidence for the existence of a<br />

Creator [and this Creator is Allâhu ta’âlâ]. Creatures in the<br />

universe have attributes. Then, Allâhu ta’âlâ, who creates them,<br />

has these attributes.<br />

[Everything other than Allâhu ta’âlâ is called (Mâ’siwâ) or<br />

(’Âlem), for which the term (Tabî’at) (Nature) has been used<br />

recently. All the ’âlems (worlds) were nonexistent. Allâhu ta’âlâ<br />

created them all. All the ’âlems are dispensable and of recent<br />

occurrence. That is, they may come into existence from<br />

[1] Teftâzânî passed away in Semmerkand in 792 [A.D. 1389].<br />

– 353 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!