Report on Progress Toward Security and Stability in - United States ...
Report on Progress Toward Security and Stability in - United States ...
Report on Progress Toward Security and Stability in - United States ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In November 2011, the Executive Board of the Internati<strong>on</strong>al M<strong>on</strong>etary Fund (IMF) approved a<br />
new three-year, $133.6M Extended Credit Facility program for Afghanistan, which is <strong>in</strong>tended to<br />
support strengthened ec<strong>on</strong>omic <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial governance. Follow<strong>in</strong>g the collapse of Kabul Bank,<br />
the IMF required the Afghan Government to place Kabul Bank <strong>in</strong> receivership <strong>and</strong> take a series<br />
of steps to strengthen governance of the bank<strong>in</strong>g system prior to approval of a new program. In<br />
additi<strong>on</strong> to the prior acti<strong>on</strong>s for approval of the program, the Afghan Government <strong>and</strong> IMF staff<br />
developed a 30-po<strong>in</strong>t bank<strong>in</strong>g sector acti<strong>on</strong> plan for the government to implement between<br />
spr<strong>in</strong>g 2011 <strong>and</strong> March 2013. Adherence to the c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s of the IMF program allows the<br />
Afghan Government to dem<strong>on</strong>strate commitment to ec<strong>on</strong>omic <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial reforms <strong>and</strong><br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the support of <strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>al d<strong>on</strong>ors, some of whom had withheld aid for the Afghan<br />
Government until a new IMF program was <strong>in</strong> place.<br />
The Afghan Government c<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>ues to work with the <strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>al community to garner support<br />
for the 22 Nati<strong>on</strong>al Priority Programs (NPPs) agreed up<strong>on</strong> at the 2010 Kabul C<strong>on</strong>ference. The<br />
NPPs outl<strong>in</strong>e strategic security, governance, development reform, <strong>and</strong> service delivery priorities<br />
over the next three years. The NPP process resumed after a 10-m<strong>on</strong>th delay stemm<strong>in</strong>g from the<br />
Kabul Bank crisis 27<br />
The <strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>al community had collectively determ<strong>in</strong>ed that it <strong>on</strong>ly endorse NPPs that are<br />
feasible <strong>and</strong> that they were will<strong>in</strong>g to fund, reflect<strong>in</strong>g a renewed commitment to the NPPs <strong>and</strong><br />
the Kabul Process. The current level of endorsement of 50 percent of NPPs is encourag<strong>in</strong>g;<br />
however, the priority programs rema<strong>in</strong> significantly beh<strong>in</strong>d schedule, as all NPPs were due to be<br />
endorsed by July 2011. The Afghan Government has committed to f<strong>in</strong>aliz<strong>in</strong>g the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
NPPs prior to the July 2012 Tokyo c<strong>on</strong>ference. At the July C<strong>on</strong>ference, the <strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
community will expect Afghanistan to present a prioritized <strong>and</strong> sequenced set of NPPs, given<br />
sufficient funds will not be available for all projects at the same time.<br />
5.2: ASSESSMENT OF SUB-NATIONAL GOVERNANCE<br />
The <strong>in</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al structure of sub-nati<strong>on</strong>al governance <strong>in</strong> Afghanistan is provided by the Afghan<br />
C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>, the extant Local Government Law, the Sub-Nati<strong>on</strong>al Governance Policy, Public<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial Management Laws <strong>and</strong> the organizati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>and</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative structure of the<br />
Independent Directorate for Local Governance (which <strong>in</strong>cludes Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Governors’ Offices,<br />
District Governors’ Offices, <strong>and</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial municipalities as structures). The result is a highly<br />
centralized structure for sub-nati<strong>on</strong>al governance <strong>in</strong> which budget<strong>in</strong>g is d<strong>on</strong>e by central<br />
M<strong>in</strong>istries <strong>and</strong> the M<strong>in</strong>istry of F<strong>in</strong>ance. Prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>and</strong> district adm<strong>in</strong>istrati<strong>on</strong>s, under the<br />
prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>and</strong> district governor, provide coord<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>, plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>puts, <strong>and</strong> m<strong>on</strong>itor<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
services delivered by M<strong>in</strong>istries. Implementati<strong>on</strong> of services is primarily d<strong>on</strong>e by central<br />
m<strong>in</strong>istries, which are expected, over time, to delegate more implementati<strong>on</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities to the<br />
prov<strong>in</strong>cial level, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the scope for sub-nati<strong>on</strong>al plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> accountability.<br />
Sub-nati<strong>on</strong>al bodies at prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>and</strong> district levels have established structures <strong>in</strong> most regi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
but rema<strong>in</strong> unable to provide many basic government services. The Afghan Government<br />
27 The Jo<strong>in</strong>t Coord<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> M<strong>on</strong>itor<strong>in</strong>g Board is the body resp<strong>on</strong>sible for oversee<strong>in</strong>g the implementati<strong>on</strong> of the Afghan<br />
Compact, <strong>and</strong> is composed of Afghan Government officials, members of the <strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>al community, NATO/ISAF,<br />
<strong>and</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al representatives from the regi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
71