15.12.2012 Views

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 4 4 ' <strong>GUNS</strong>, <strong>GERMS</strong>, <strong>AND</strong> <strong>STEEL</strong><br />

I patiently explained to my Fore companions that I had read about some<br />

mushrooms' being poisonous, that I had heard of even expert American<br />

mushroom collectors' dying because of the difficulty of distinguishing safe<br />

from dangerous mushrooms, and that although we were all hungry, it just<br />

wasn't worth the risk. At that point my companions got angry and told<br />

me to shut up and listen while they explained some things to me. After I<br />

had been quizzing them for years about names of hundreds of trees and<br />

birds, how could I insult them by assuming they didn't have names for<br />

different mushrooms? Only Americans could be so stupid as to confuse<br />

poisonous mushrooms with safe ones. They went on to lecture me about<br />

29 types of edible mushroom species, each species' name in the Fore language,<br />

and where in the forest one should look for it. This one, the tanti,<br />

grew on trees, and it was delicious and perfectly edible.<br />

Whenever I have taken New Guineans with me to other parts of their<br />

island, they regularly talk about local plants and animals with other New<br />

Guineans whom they meet, and they gather potentially useful plants and<br />

bring them back to their home villages to try planting them. My experiences<br />

with New Guineans are paralleled by those of ethnobiologists studying<br />

traditional peoples elsewhere. However, all such peoples either<br />

practice at least some food production or are the partly acculturated last<br />

remnants of the world's former hunter-gatherer societies. Knowledge of<br />

wild species was presumably even more detailed before the rise of food<br />

production, when everyone on Earth still depended entirely on wild species<br />

for food. The first farmers were heirs to that knowledge, accumulated<br />

through tens of thousands of years of nature observation by biologically<br />

modern humans living in intimate dependence on the natural world. It<br />

therefore seems extremely unlikely that wild species of potential value<br />

would have escaped the notice of the first farmers.<br />

The other, related question is whether ancient hunter-gatherers and<br />

farmers similarly put their ethnobiological knowledge to good use in<br />

selecting wild plants to gather and eventually to cultivate. One test comes<br />

from an archaeological site at the edge of the Euphrates Valley in Syria,<br />

called Tell Abu Hureyra. Between 10,000 and 9000 B.C. the people living<br />

there may already have been residing year-round in villages, but they were<br />

still hunter-gatherers; crop cultivation began only in the succeeding millennium.<br />

The archaeologists Gordon Hillman, Susan Colledge, and David<br />

Harris retrieved large quantities of charred plant remains from the site,<br />

probably representing discarded garbage of wild plants gathered elsewhere

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!