15.12.2012 Views

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 6 4 " <strong>GUNS</strong>, <strong>GERMS</strong>, <strong>AND</strong> <strong>STEEL</strong><br />

puted claims of older human occupation sites in the Americas prove valid,<br />

those postulated pre-Clovis inhabitants remained for unknown reasons<br />

very sparsely distributed and did not launch a Pleistocene proliferation of<br />

hunter-gatherer societies with expanding populations, technology, and art<br />

as in the Old World. Food production was already arising in the Fertile<br />

Crescent only 1,500 years after the time when Clovis-derived hunter-gatherers<br />

were just reaching southern South America.<br />

Several possible consequences of that Eurasian head start deserve consideration.<br />

First, could it have taken a long time after 11,000 B.C. for the<br />

Americas to fill up with people? When one works out the likely numbers<br />

involved, one finds that this effect would make only a trivial contribution<br />

to the Americas' 5,000-year lag in food-producing villages. The calculations<br />

given in Chapter 1 tell us that even if a mere 100 pioneering Native<br />

Americans had crossed the Canadian border into the lower United States<br />

and increased at a rate of only 1 percent per year, they would have saturated<br />

the Americas with hunter-gatherers within 1,000 years. Spreading<br />

south at a mere one mile per month, those pioneers would have reached<br />

the southern tip of South America only 700 years after crossing the Canadian<br />

border. Those postulated rates of spread and of population increase<br />

are very low compared with actual known rates for peoples occupying<br />

previously uninhabited or sparsely inhabited lands. Hence the Americas<br />

were probably fully occupied by hunter-gatherers within a few centuries<br />

of the arrival of the first colonists.<br />

Second, could a large part of the 5,000-year lag have represented the<br />

time that the first Americans required to become familiar with the new<br />

local plant species, animal species, and rock sources that they encountered?<br />

If we can again reason by analogy with New Guinean and Polynesian<br />

hunter-gatherers and farmers occupying previously unfamiliar<br />

environments—such as Maori colonists of New Zealand or Tudawhe colonists<br />

of New Guinea's Karimui Basin—the colonists probably discovered<br />

the best rock sources and learned to distinguish useful from poisonous<br />

wild plants and animals in much less than a century.<br />

Third, what about Eurasians' head start in developing locally appropriate<br />

technology? The early farmers of the Fertile Crescent and China<br />

were heirs to the technology that behaviorially modern Homo sapiens had<br />

been developing to exploit local resources in those areas for tens of thousands<br />

of years. For instance, the stone sickles, underground storage pits,<br />

and other technology that hunter-gatherers of the Fertile Crescent had

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!