15.12.2012 Views

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

YALI'S PEOPLE • 309<br />

Australia was the paucity of domesticable wild plants. Even modern European<br />

plant geneticists have failed to develop any crop except macadamia<br />

nuts from Australia's native wild flora. The list of the world's potential<br />

prize cereals—the 56 wild grass species with the heaviest grains—includes<br />

only two Australian species, both of which rank near the bottom of the<br />

list (grain weight only 13 milligrams, compared with a whopping 40 milligrams<br />

for the heaviest grains elsewhere in the world). That's not to say<br />

that Australia had no potential crops at all, or that Aboriginal Australians<br />

would never have developed indigenous food production. Some plants,<br />

such as certain species of yams, taro, and arrowroot, are cultivated in<br />

southern New Guinea but also grow wild in northern Australia and were<br />

gathered by Aborigines there. As we shall see, Aborigines in the climatically<br />

most favorable areas of Australia were evolving in a direction that<br />

might have eventuated in food production. But any food production that<br />

did arise indigenously in Australia would have been limited by the lack of<br />

domesticable animals, the poverty of domesticable plants, and the difficult<br />

soils and climate.<br />

Nomadism, the hunter-gatherer lifestyle, and minimal investment in<br />

shelter and possessions were sensible adaptations to Australia's ENSOdriven<br />

resource unpredictability. When local conditions deteriorated, Aborigines<br />

simply moved to an area where conditions were temporarily better.<br />

Rather than depending on just a few crops that could fail, they minimized<br />

risk by developing an economy based on a great variety of wild foods, not<br />

all of which were likely to fail simultaneously. Instead of having fluctuating<br />

populations that periodically outran their resources and starved, they<br />

maintained smaller populations that enjoyed an abundance of food in<br />

good years and a sufficiency in bad years.<br />

The Aboriginal Australian substitute for food production has been<br />

termed "firestick farming." The Aborigines modified and managed the surrounding<br />

landscape in ways that increased its production of edible plants<br />

and animals, without resorting to cultivation. In particular, they intentionally<br />

burned much of the landscape periodically. That served several purposes:<br />

the fires drove out animals that could be killed and eaten<br />

immediately; fires converted dense thickets into open parkland in which<br />

people could travel more easily; the parkland was also an ideal habitat for<br />

kangaroos, Australia's prime game animal; and the fires stimulated the<br />

growth both of new grass on which kangaroos fed and of fern roots on<br />

which Aborigines themselves fed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!