15.12.2012 Views

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

300 • <strong>GUNS</strong>, <strong>GERMS</strong>, <strong>AND</strong> <strong>STEEL</strong><br />

a few decades of colonizing a continent whose inhabitants after more than<br />

40,000 years were still nonliterate hunter-gatherers? It is especially striking<br />

that Australia has some of the world's richest iron and aluminum<br />

deposits, as well as rich reserves of copper, tin, lead, and zinc. Why, then,<br />

were Native Australians still ignorant of metal tools and living in the Stone<br />

Age?<br />

It seems like a perfectly controlled experiment in the evolution of<br />

human societies. The continent was the same; only the people were different.<br />

Ergo, the explanation for the differences between Native Australian<br />

and European-Australian societies must lie in the different people composing<br />

them. The logic behind this racist conclusion appears compelling. We<br />

shall see, however, that it contains a simple error.<br />

As<br />

THE FIRST step in examining this logic, let us examine the origins of<br />

the peoples themselves. Australia and New Guinea were both occupied by<br />

at least 40,000 years ago, at a time when they were both still joined as<br />

Greater Australia. A glance at a map (Figure 15.1) suggests that the colonists<br />

must have originated ultimately from the nearest continent, Southeast<br />

Asia, by island hopping through the Indonesian Archipelago. This conclusion<br />

is supported by genetic relationships between modern Australians,<br />

New Guineans, and Asians, and by the survival today of a few populations<br />

of somewhat similar physical appearance in the Philippines, Malay Peninsula,<br />

and Andaman Islands off Myanmar.<br />

Once the colonists had reached the shores of Greater Australia, they<br />

spread quickly over the whole continent to occupy even its farthest reaches<br />

and most inhospitable habitats. By 40,000 years ago, fossils and stone<br />

tools attest to their presence in Australia's southwestern corner; by 35,000<br />

years ago, in Australia's southeastern corner and Tasmania, the corner of<br />

Australia most remote from the colonists' likely beachhead in western Australia<br />

or New Guinea (the parts nearest Indonesia and Asia); and by<br />

30,000 years ago, in the cold New Guinea highlands. All of those areas<br />

could have been reached overland from a western beachhead. However,<br />

the colonization of both the Bismarck and the Solomon Archipelagoes<br />

northeast of New Guinea, by 35,000 years ago, required further overwater<br />

crossings of dozens of miles. The occupation could have been even more<br />

rapid than that apparent spread of dates from 40,000 to 30,000 years ago,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!