15.12.2012 Views

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HEMISPHERES COLLIDING • 3 6 5<br />

been evolving to utilize wild cereals were available to the first cereal farmers<br />

of the Fertile Crescent. In contrast, the first settlers of the Americas<br />

arrived in Alaska with equipment appropriate to the Siberian Arctic tundra.<br />

They had to invent for themselves the equipment suitable to each<br />

new habitat they encountered. That technology lag may have contributed<br />

significantly to the delay in Native American developments.<br />

An even more obvious factor behind the delay was the wild animals and<br />

plants available for domestication. As I discussed in Chapter 6, when<br />

hunter-gatherers adopt food production, it is not because they foresee the<br />

potential benefits awaiting their remote descendants but because incipient<br />

food production begins to offer advantages over the hunter-gatherer lifestyle.<br />

Early food production was less competitive with hunting-gathering<br />

in the Americas than in the Fertile Crescent or China, partly owing to<br />

the Americas' virtual lack of domesticable wild mammals. Hence early<br />

American farmers remained dependent on wild animals for animal protein<br />

and necessarily remained part-time hunter-gatherers, whereas in both the<br />

Fertile Crescent and China animal domestication followed plant domestication<br />

very closely in time to create a food producing package that quickly<br />

won out over hunting-gathering. In addition, Eurasian domestic animals<br />

made Eurasian agriculture itself more competitive by providing fertilizer,<br />

and eventually by drawing plows.<br />

Features of American wild plants also contributed to the lesser competitiveness<br />

of Native American food production. That conclusion is clearest<br />

for the eastern United States, where less than a dozen crops were domesticated,<br />

including small-seeded grains but no large-seeded grains, pulses,<br />

fiber crops, or cultivated fruit or nut trees. It is also clear for Mesoameri¬<br />

ca's staple grain of corn, which spread to become a dominant crop elsewhere<br />

in the Americas as well. Whereas the Fertile Crescent's wild wheat<br />

and barley evolved into crops with minimal changes and within a few centuries,<br />

wild teosinte may have required several thousand years to evolve<br />

into corn, having to undergo drastic changes in its reproductive biology<br />

and energy allocation to seed production, loss of the seed's rock-hard casings,<br />

and an enormous increase in cob size.<br />

As a result, even if one accepts the recently postulated later dates for<br />

the onset of Native American plant domestication, about 1,500 or 2,000<br />

years would have elapsed between that onset (about 3000-2500 B.C.) and<br />

widespread year-round villages (1800-500 B.C.) in Mesoamerica, the<br />

inland Andes, and the eastern United States. Native American farming

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!