15.12.2012 Views

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

GUNS, GERMS AND STEEL - Cloverport Independent Schools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

350 ' <strong>GUNS</strong>, <strong>GERMS</strong>, <strong>AND</strong> <strong>STEEL</strong><br />

most, some of them merely adopted Austronesian languages, possibly in<br />

order to communicate with the long-distance traders who linked societies.<br />

THUS, THE OUTCOME of the Austronesian expansion in the New<br />

Guinea region was opposite to that in Indonesia and the Philippines. In<br />

the latter region the indigenous population disappeared—presumably<br />

driven off, killed, infected, or assimilated by the invaders. In the former<br />

region the indigenous population mostly kept the invaders out. The invaders<br />

(the Austronesians) were the same in both cases, and the indigenous<br />

populations may also have been genetically similar to each other, if the<br />

original Indonesian population supplanted by Austronesians really was<br />

related to New Guineans, as I suggested earlier. Why the opposite outcomes?<br />

The answer becomes obvious when one considers the differing cultural<br />

circumstances of Indonesia's and New Guinea's indigenous populations.<br />

Before Austronesians arrived, most of Indonesia was thinly occupied by<br />

hunter-gatherers lacking even polished stone tools. In contrast, food production<br />

had already been established for thousands of years in the New<br />

Guinea highlands, and probably in the New Guinea lowlands and in the<br />

Bismarcks and Solomons as well. The New Guinea highlands supported<br />

some of the densest populations of Stone Age people anywhere in the modern<br />

world.<br />

Austronesians enjoyed few advantages in competing with those established<br />

New Guinean populations. Some of the crops on which Austronesians<br />

subsisted, such as taro, yams, and bananas, had probably already<br />

been independently domesticated in New Guinea before Austronesians<br />

arrived. The New Guineans readily integrated Austronesian chickens,<br />

dogs, and especially pigs into their food-producing economies. New Guineans<br />

already had polished stone tools. They were at least as resistant to<br />

tropical diseases as were Austronesians, because they carried the same five<br />

types of genetic protections against malaria as did Austronesians, and<br />

some or all of those genes evolved independently in New Guinea. New<br />

Guineans were already accomplished seafarers, although not as accomplished<br />

as the makers of Lapita pottery. Tens of thousands of years before<br />

the arrival of Austronesians, New Guineans had colonized the Bismarck<br />

and Solomon Archipelagoes, and a trade in obsidian (a volcanic stone suitable<br />

for making sharp tools) was thriving in the Bismarcks at least 18,000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!