11.09.2019 Views

Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For the early works are executed with a certain f inesse <strong>and</strong> an incredible<br />

diligence, so that they can be seen from close as well as from a distance<br />

while these last pictures are executed with broad <strong>and</strong> bold strokes <strong>and</strong><br />

smudges, so that from nearby nothing can be seen whereas from a distance<br />

they seem peifect.<br />

In the case of the Venus <strong>and</strong> Adonis at the Getty, the earlier technique was<br />

used. The paint layers are few <strong>and</strong> relatively thinly applied. Where visible in<br />

infrared reflectography, the underdrawing seems to have been closely followed.<br />

No significant changes from the carefully planned composition have been<br />

made. Some later additions seem to have been made, however, in areas such<br />

as Adonis's arms <strong>and</strong> Venus's legs <strong>and</strong> back. Some areas in the l<strong>and</strong>scape also<br />

appear to be built up with several paint layers. The pigments seem to be<br />

thoroughly ground directly into the binding medium. This contrasts strongly<br />

with the pigments in the National Gallery's Venus <strong>and</strong> Adonis. Observed<br />

under a stereo microscope, many lumps of pigment are visible, suggesting that<br />

in making the paint, the pigments were not really ground into, but simply<br />

stirred into the oil. Some differences can be noted between the version in<br />

the Getty <strong>and</strong> the one in the Prado. Judging from the development as described<br />

by the two contemporary comments, the Getty painting is more<br />

loosely executed than the Prado version, <strong>and</strong> must have been made at a later<br />

date, perhaps around 1560. The National Gallery version can definitely be<br />

considered to have been painted after the Getty <strong>and</strong> Prado versions.<br />

Paint layers: the pigments<br />

Yellow pigments. The highlights of Adonis's belt were executed in a bright<br />

yellow with occasional small orange-red dots placed on the highlights. When<br />

examined with PLM, samples taken from the area showed that the yellow<br />

consisted of highly birefringent mica-like particles (n>1 .66). The yellow pigment<br />

had all the optical characteristics of orpiment, including a laminated<br />

form <strong>and</strong> a waxy luster of the fairly large crystalline particles. The identification<br />

of orpiment was confirmed by finding larger amounts of arsenic in<br />

the sample. A small microchemical test showed that the sample also contained<br />

sulfides.<br />

The red dots on Adonis's belt <strong>and</strong> the orange-red of Adonis's shoe were also<br />

executed in an arsenic-containing pigment realgar. These pigments were<br />

identified by the usual means of microscopic <strong>and</strong> microchemical analysis. In<br />

addition, the findings were confirmed by XRD <strong>and</strong> XRF (Fig. 2).<br />

The use of orpiment <strong>and</strong> realgar in European easel paintings is comparatively<br />

rare, but it is not unusual to find them in Venetian painting; the use of<br />

orpiment occurred more often in manuscript illuminations. This lack of popularity<br />

may be due to the fact that both pigments are highly poisonous, <strong>and</strong><br />

good alternatives, such as lead-tin yellow or yellow lakes fo r orpiment or<br />

vermilion for realgar, were readily available. Because of their sulfidic nature,<br />

both orpiment <strong>and</strong> realgar are not very compatible with many other pigments.<br />

The Theophilus manuscript even states that orpiment cannot be mixed with<br />

any other color because it would destroy them. While realgar was sometimes<br />

used to prevent putrefaction of binding media by bacteria, fungi, <strong>and</strong> microorganisms,<br />

historical recipes describing the use of realgar as an actual pigment<br />

are extremely rare (7).<br />

Considering their drawbacks, it is surprising to see how frequently these<br />

pigments were used in sixteenth-century Venetian painting. They have been<br />

identified in several paintings by Titian <strong>and</strong> Giorgione <strong>and</strong> in many paintings<br />

by Tintoretto <strong>and</strong> Bassano. The reasons for this preference are not immediately<br />

evident. Both mineral substances could not be fo und in the immediate<br />

vicinity <strong>and</strong> had to be imported. They are conspicuously absent in paintings<br />

made in the area around Naples where the minerals actually do occur in the<br />

fumaroles near Mount Vesuvius. Their frequent use in sixteenth-century Venice<br />

may relate to the increasing use of oil as the paint medium. The pigment<br />

Birkmaier, Wallert, <strong>and</strong> Rothe 121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!