11.09.2019 Views

Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

considered a kind of technical signature, although not of an individual h<strong>and</strong>:<br />

It is the signature of Scorel's shop. Most of the pigments used in completing<br />

the image are, of course, also common to those found in Scorel's paintings.<br />

No ultramarine has been found, however, <strong>and</strong> the blue used throughout the<br />

painting is azurite. This no doubt proves not only that Jan van Scorel is the<br />

only north Netherl<strong>and</strong>ish artist documented to have used natural ultramarine<br />

in his works, but that he also used it selectively, saving it for his most important<br />

commissions (10). It was, therefore, not available to his assistant, or at<br />

least not for this painting. Not unexpectedly, the blue-over-rose paint layer<br />

structure is also lacking in Lamentation.<br />

Figure 4. Infrared reflectogram detail if<br />

Lamentation, showing the dark undermodelil1g<br />

strokes if Nicodemus's turbal1 in the upper<br />

background. I'!frared reflectography by M.<br />

Faries.<br />

;;<br />

I<br />

I<br />

s) (.10<br />

'1) 10-'3£<br />

3) q -2-1<br />

Z) g-I&<br />

Figure 5. Cross sectiol1 from Maarten van.<br />

Heemskerck's St. Luke with measuremen.ts in<br />

microns: layer 1, possible trace of ground;<br />

layer 2, gray intermediate layer; layer 3,<br />

compact layer if black with black particles;<br />

layer 4, admixture if white, black, <strong>and</strong> red;<br />

layer 5, white layer with one large azurite<br />

crystal; layer 6, varnish. Photograph by M.<br />

Faries (after J. R. J. van Asperen de Boer).<br />

Other ways in which the painting practice in Lamentation deviates from ScoreI's<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard require a different explanation, since these differences form critical<br />

links with other paintings that can now be considered early Heemskerck.<br />

Dark modeling strokes executed with a brush have been detected in the<br />

finishing stages of Lamentation. Some strokes that underlie the surface colors<br />

can be disclosed by infrared (Fig. 4). Other black-colored modeling is applied<br />

in the final paint layer, especially in reds. The cross section from John the<br />

Evangelist's drapery clearly shows the black particles in the vermilion <strong>and</strong> red<br />

lake admixture (11).<br />

Although Scorel's Baptism <strong>and</strong> Heemskerck's Lamentation are the focus of this<br />

study, their techniques may be compared to a substantial amount of related<br />

technical material. Ample evidence proves that the paint-layer structure described<br />

above typifies the Scorel group paintings during Scorel's time in Haarlem.<br />

In addition, since nine paintings now attributed by some scholars to the<br />

early Heemskerck period have also been examined by various technical<br />

means, the evolution of Heemskerck's painting technique can be surveyed<br />

(12). Of the nine paintings, only four have been studied with the binocular<br />

microscope <strong>and</strong> sampled so far. At least three paintings use the blue-overrose<br />

structure typical of the Scorel group although, in each case, the blue<br />

pigment is azurite. Other aspects of the paint layer structure can be documented<br />

by X-ray or infrared reflectography. The infrared vidicon distinguishes<br />

pure colors that look black to our eyes but are transparent to the eye of the<br />

vidicon from "true" blacks, which remain opaque in reflectograms. This instrumental<br />

technique can therefore locate black modeling or under modeling<br />

in the same way it locates underdrawings. Dark modeling strokes used to<br />

block in forms can also be found in at least three other works in the hypothetical<br />

early Heemskerck group. The technique is unknown in the Scorel<br />

group. The presence of a thin layer of lead white over the ground can be<br />

verified in cross sections, as well as by X-radiography where it appears as<br />

broadly-brushed streaking. This practice is evident in a majority of works in<br />

the early Heemskerck group. It is the coupling of underdrawing with this<br />

layer, however, which undergoes a change; <strong>and</strong> finally, the character of the<br />

layer itself changes. In Lamentation, the black chalk underdrawing is supplemented<br />

by dark modeling <strong>and</strong> undermodeling in paint. Several other paintings<br />

have a fo rm of underdrawing, but it is executed in a dark, paintlike<br />

substance rather than chalk. In four works, the underdrawing is undetectable.<br />

No underdrawing could be detected in the St. Luke <strong>Painting</strong> a Portrait of the<br />

Virgin <strong>and</strong> Child (1532), an indisputable early Heemskerck, <strong>and</strong> no underdrawing<br />

appeared in samples. In this work Heemskerck used a gray intermediate<br />

layer, a very different basis upon which to build up the fo rms of his<br />

painting (Fig. 5) (13).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Heemskerck must have worked in Scorel's studio for all or part of the period<br />

from 1527 to 1530, <strong>and</strong> after Scorel left Haarlem in September 1530, Heemskerck<br />

continued to paint in the city as an independent master until he himself<br />

left for Rome in 1532. The artist moved from a graphic black-on-white<br />

layout to more subtle forms of shading <strong>and</strong> undermodeling; based on changes<br />

in painting technique, an evolution is proposed for Heemskerck in this period.<br />

138<br />

<strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Painting</strong> <strong>Techniques</strong>, <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Studio</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!