11.09.2019 Views

Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

one black; <strong>and</strong> if the painter expects painting the horse to be a day's work,<br />

no other colors need be prepared for that day, apart from the five pigments<br />

just mentioned.<br />

It is notable that throughout hundreds of recipes of this kind, only a severely<br />

limited range of pigments is prescribed. This provides a piece of information<br />

that is of critical importance to the picture of the artists' practice being<br />

sketched here: paint was only ground <strong>and</strong> prepared when it was needed. It is<br />

precisely because painters wished to keep working without unnecessary delays<br />

<strong>and</strong> therefore found it advantageous to use paint that dried quickly (thus<br />

containing strong drying oils <strong>and</strong> other drying agents), that paint could not<br />

be kept for long. If the complete range of pigments, each already ground<br />

with oil, had to be available, this would mean that much paint would have<br />

to be thrown away unused. Hence the economic reasons for the method of<br />

working with restricted, specific palettes are clear. The technical background<br />

of this method will be discussed briefly in this paper.<br />

It is significant that the series of recipes recorded by Willem Beurs concludes<br />

with flesh colors (16). Beurs writes as follows: "Just as we humans consider<br />

ourselves the foremost among animals; so, too, are we the foremost subject of<br />

the art of painting, <strong>and</strong> it is in painting human flesh that its highest achievements<br />

are to be seen" (17). The palette Beurs gives fo r painting human flesh<br />

comprised mixtures of the pigments lead white, light ochre, schijtgeel (an organic<br />

yellow), vermilion, red lake, tawny ochre, terre verde, umber, <strong>and</strong> "coal<br />

black" (probably ground charcoal which gives a bluish black). It was the<br />

palette for what was considered to be the summit of creation, <strong>and</strong> the most<br />

difficult subject of all to paint, the human figure. It is almost invariably the<br />

palette for flesh colors that is depicted in self portraits <strong>and</strong> studio scenes after<br />

1600, paintings that are generally intended to represent the art of painting at<br />

its noblest.<br />

It will come as no surprise to anyone who has examined fifteenth- or sixteenth-century<br />

paintings to any depth as material objects, that every passage<br />

was executed as a separate entity. The additive character of the painting as a<br />

whole is generally plain to see, despite the psychological compulsion perceptually<br />

acting on the viewer to transform the painting into a Gestalt.<br />

Even though revolutionary developments during the seventeenth century<br />

brought the pursuit of pictorial unity to an unprecedented level, the sources<br />

quoted above suggest that no change had taken place in the tradition of using<br />

recipes for various components of the painting. The economic rationale for<br />

this approach has already been mentioned above. Originally, however, technical<br />

reasons may have provided an even stronger motivation for executing a<br />

painting as a series of successive passages.<br />

For the twentieth-century painter, who normally regards paint as a pasty<br />

substance of a certain color that can be squeezed out of a tube, it is hard to<br />

imagine that to artists of not only the fifteenth <strong>and</strong> sixteenth centuries, but<br />

also through the first half of the nineteenth century, each pigment presented<br />

its own inherent possibilities <strong>and</strong> constraints (18). Some pigments could not<br />

be worked up with oil; some pigments could only safely be mixed with one<br />

or two other pigments; some pigments could only be used transparently <strong>and</strong><br />

yet others only opaquely. Other properties, too, such as color permanence,<br />

workability, drying qualities, <strong>and</strong> so on, could differ so strongly from one<br />

pigment to another that it was normal to use a given pigment either in pure<br />

form or mixed with any of a limited number of other pigments in order to<br />

somewhat modifY the tone <strong>and</strong> color (19). This helps explain why, in the<br />

work of artists such as van Eyck or Lucas van Leyden, the colors unmistakably<br />

interlock like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle, <strong>and</strong> each color has an individual<br />

character, especially as to transparency, surface texture, <strong>and</strong> thickness of the<br />

paint layer. The most easily workable pigments were the earth colors, which<br />

ranged from yellow ochre through red ochres to the darkest brown tints <strong>and</strong><br />

were varied in tone by mixing together <strong>and</strong> by the addition of white or<br />

200<br />

<strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Painting</strong> <strong>Techniques</strong>, <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Studio</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!