Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Pre-Raphaelite painters <strong>and</strong> never to any great extent. The myth of the Pre<br />
Raphaelite technique arose from a single paragraph in Hunt's 1,000-page,<br />
two-volume autobiography. Citing as an example the painting Valentine Rescuing<br />
Sylvia from Proteus (Fig. 7), Hunt stated that he would (13):<br />
Figure 7. William Holman Hunt, Valentine<br />
Rescuing Sylvia from Proteus (Two<br />
Gentlemen of Verona), 1851. Courtesy if<br />
the Birmingham Museums <strong>and</strong> Art Callery,<br />
Birmingham, Engl<strong>and</strong>. This is the painting<br />
Hunt was working on when he described the<br />
wet-ground technique ill his autobiography (I,<br />
276): "The heads of Valentine alld if Proteus,<br />
the h<strong>and</strong>s if these figures, <strong>and</strong> the brighter<br />
costumes in the same painting had been<br />
executed in this way . ... In the country we<br />
had used it, so fa r, mainly for blossoms of<br />
flowers, for which it was singularly valuable. "<br />
Paint daubs if van'ous mixtures of red are<br />
visible on the sp<strong>and</strong>rels.<br />
Select a prepared ground, originally Jor its brightness, <strong>and</strong> renovate it, if<br />
necessary, with Jresh white when first it comes into the studio, white to be<br />
mixed with a very little amber or copal varnish. Let this last coat become<br />
oj a thoroughly stone-like hardness. Upon this suiface complete with exactness<br />
the outline oj the part in h<strong>and</strong>. On the morning Jo r the painting,<br />
with Jresh white (from which all supeifluous oil has been extracted by means<br />
oj absorbent paper, <strong>and</strong> to which a small drop oj varnish has been added)<br />
spread a Ju rther coat very evenly with a palette knife over the part Jor the<br />
day's work, oj such consistency that the drawing should Ja intly show<br />
through. In some cases the thickened white may be applied to the Jo rms<br />
needing brilliancy with a brush, by the aid oj rectified spirits. Over this<br />
wet ground, the colour (transparent <strong>and</strong> semi-transparent) should be laid<br />
with light sable brushes, <strong>and</strong> the touches must be made so tenderly that<br />
the ground below shall not be worked up, yet so Jar enticed to blend with<br />
the superimposed tints as to correct the qualities oj thinness <strong>and</strong> staininess<br />
[sic], which over a dry ground transparent colours used would inevitably<br />
exhibit. <strong>Painting</strong> oj this kind cannot be retouched except with an entire<br />
loss oj luminosity.<br />
In spite of the attention given to this quotation, however, it is rarely pointed<br />
out that Hunt describes this as a technique with which he experimented at<br />
one point in his career, used fo r specific design areas rather than entire canvases<br />
<strong>and</strong> not as a wholesale working method, as has been interpreted. Indeed,<br />
until the appearance of the autobiography in 1905, Hunt appears to repudiate<br />
his early experimental technique. It remains unmentioned in his first version<br />
of his memoirs, nor does it crop up in the frequent h<strong>and</strong>written inscriptions<br />
in which he recorded details of technique on bare sections of canvas or support<br />
(14) (Fig. 8). Hunt dismisses its relevance to his career in an article on<br />
his painting technique that appeared in the magazine Porifolio in 1875, stating<br />
that he used wet grounds only from 1850 to 1854 to capture the effects of<br />
sunlight (15). While these five early years are viewed today as Hunt's period<br />
of greatest productivity <strong>and</strong> success, to his contemporaries his highest achievements<br />
came later in a career that spanned seven decades (16).<br />
The sudden prominence accorded to the technique in 1905, may be due not<br />
to Hunt himself, but to his wife, Edith, seeking to enhance his reputation<br />
through the implication of technical innovation. Suffering from glaucoma,<br />
Hunt dictated much of his memoir to Edith who, according to their gr<strong>and</strong>daughter,<br />
among others, took liberties with the text, "deleting passages ...<br />
she considered unsuitable for posterity" (author's emphasis) (17). Edith's urge<br />
to improve went so far as taking advantage of her husb<strong>and</strong>'s blindness to have<br />
a studio assistant repaint Hunt's portrait of her, secretly slimming her waist<br />
<strong>and</strong> reddening her lips (18). It may well have been at her suggestion that the<br />
wet-ground technique, after fifty years of oblivion, abruptly became of importance<br />
in her husb<strong>and</strong>'s career, serving as one more opportunity to assert<br />
his innovation, skill, <strong>and</strong> pivotal role in the movement he had helped to shape.<br />
Along with the disproportionate attention given to the Pre-Raphaelite technique<br />
comes a misunderst<strong>and</strong>ing of the technique itself, due to a fu ndamental<br />
misreading of the word "ground." In Hunt's writings, the term often refers<br />
to an imprimatura, or underpaint, layer, rather than the intermediary priming<br />
that prepares a solid or fabric support to receive paint. In his diary, fo r example,<br />
Hunt refers to "lay[ing] a new ground for the left shoulder, which I<br />
do of white, cobalt green, <strong>and</strong> cadmium" (19). Further investigation confirms<br />
that Hunt's "wet ground" was actually a layer of paint, the "fresh white" of<br />
his writings referring to flake white oil paint, as he indicated in a letter of<br />
1878 (20):<br />
162<br />
<strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Painting</strong> <strong>Techniques</strong>, <strong>Materials</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Studio</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>