20.12.2012 Views

(a) 100 µm - Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin

(a) 100 µm - Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin

(a) 100 µm - Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.1 Interlayer 69<br />

4.1.2 Molybdenum interface<br />

An attractive alternative to the oxidation of the aluminum layer is the direct depo-<br />

sition of an interlayer. This would allow to deposit the layer stack without breaking<br />

the vacuum which allows much faster sample preparation. On the one hand direct<br />

or reactive deposition of an oxide is an option. However, also very different ap-<br />

proaches can be followed. Here, thin molybdenum layers deposited between the<br />

initial Al and a-Si layers were studied as an alternative to the oxide interlayer. In<br />

Al metallization Mo, W and Ta based Si nitrides and other compounds are used<br />

as diffusion barrier [92, 93]. A Mo target within the DC magnetron sputtering<br />

chamber for Al and a-Si deposition allowed the alternative use of a Mo interlayer<br />

without any vacuum break and resulting oxidation of the Al layer. Since Mo is<br />

used in Al/Si diffusion barriers investigations it was explored wether the diffusion<br />

barrier could be deposited thin enough to allow controlled diffusion between the<br />

two layers.<br />

The controlled deposition of very thin layers is quite challenging especially with<br />

DC magnetron sputtering. To verify the success of the deposition Auger electron<br />

spectroscopy (AES) depth profiles were measured. In Fig. 4.15 the AES results for<br />

specimens with a nominal Mo thickness of dMo = 12 nm, 24 nm and 48 nm between<br />

the initial Al and a-Si layers are shown. It is clearly demonstrated that the amount<br />

of Mo at the interface increased. Thus different thicknesses of the Mo interlayer<br />

were successfully deposited.<br />

In Fig. 4.16 the crystallized fraction RC curves for samples with nominal 12 nm,<br />

24 nm and 48 nm Mo thicknesses are shown. The annealing temperature was<br />

550 °C. With increasing Mo interface thickness the processes is slowed down.<br />

While the layer exchange for the 12 nm Mo sample is finished in 6 − 7 min, the<br />

layer exchange of the sample with 48 nm Mo starts after about 20 min only.<br />

The saturation value of the crystallized fraction decreases gradually with increas-<br />

ing interlayer thickness. While for 12 nm Mo a complete layer exchange can be<br />

observed (RC = <strong>100</strong> %), only about RC = 80 % are reached for 48 nm Mo. In

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!