22.12.2012 Views

Forgeabilité des aciers inoxydables austéno-ferritiques

Forgeabilité des aciers inoxydables austéno-ferritiques

Forgeabilité des aciers inoxydables austéno-ferritiques

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tel-00672279, version 1 - 21 Feb 2012<br />

132 Chapter IV. STRAIN PARTITIONING<br />

IV.5.2.2 Why is the overall strain different from the macroscopic strain?<br />

IV.5.2.2.1 Question<br />

The second question that arises from the results is the difference between the overall strain (that is to<br />

say the average strain over the analyzed domain) and the macroscopic applied strain, see Table IV.8.<br />

How can we account for this difference?<br />

D1_W<br />

D2_W<br />

� � �<br />

overall<br />

�<br />

macro<br />

eq<br />

Map 1<br />

0.603<br />

0.391<br />

Map 2 0.809<br />

Map 1<br />

0.619<br />

0.388<br />

Map 2 0.572<br />

Table IV.11. Differences between the applied macroscopic strain and the overall strain measured<br />

over the analyzed fields in both D1_W and D2_W microstructures.<br />

IV.5.2.2.2 Answer<br />

� Back to the literature<br />

Although the mechanics of the plane strain compression test appears rather simple, the material de-<br />

forms inhomogeneously, the details depending upon external parameters such as the quality of tool<br />

lubrication and the material deformation characteristics themselves. Up to recently and the paper pub-<br />

lished by Loveday et al. [127], there was no standard for carrying out plane strain compression tests.<br />

Mirza et al. [130, 131] wrote a series of papers in an effort to show how parameters such as material<br />

type, specimen geometry (h0 and b0 in Figure IV.13.a), strain rate, and friction affect the macroscopic<br />

deformation behaviour. Mirza et al. [130, 131] used extensive finite element modeling to simulate the<br />

plane strain compression test. Two-dimensional models were adopted to reproduce hot compression<br />

of 316L-austenitic stainless steel and aluminium and a heterogeneous strain field was observed. Fig-<br />

ure IV.33 shows this heterogeneity of strain, strain rate and temperature on one half of the deformed<br />

sample (the other half deforms symmetrically). It was also shown that the heterogeneity of deformation<br />

is affected by initial geometry of the specimen but is independent of the type of material and strain<br />

rate. In this scenario, it is essential to validate experimentally the local values of strain obtained<br />

through finite elements modeling.<br />

eq

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!