22.12.2012 Views

Forgeabilité des aciers inoxydables austéno-ferritiques

Forgeabilité des aciers inoxydables austéno-ferritiques

Forgeabilité des aciers inoxydables austéno-ferritiques

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tel-00672279, version 1 - 21 Feb 2012<br />

18 Chapter I. Introduction<br />

I.2.3.3 Microstructures in the vicinity of the edges<br />

As shown in Figure I.4 and in Figure I.9.a, the cracks are always observed along the edges of the hot<br />

rolled material hence the name “edge-cracks”. The first characterizations have revealed that damage<br />

nucleation always takes place at the δ/γ interphase boundaries, see Figure I.9.b. In addition, the<br />

cracks seem to always propagate within the ferrite. No damage nucleation site is visible in the austen-<br />

ite and the cracks never propagate through an austenite grain.<br />

Edge-cracks<br />

Bulging<br />

at the edges<br />

Edge-cracks<br />

Original top<br />

surface of the plate<br />

Bulged material<br />

a) b)<br />

ND<br />

Figure I.9. a) Evolution of the transverse dimensions of the hot rolling blocks with increasing reduction;<br />

a clear transverse strain develops and cracks have been observed only in the bulged region;<br />

b) microstructure in the edge part illustrating the damage; red arrows emphasize the voids.<br />

I.3 Guideline<br />

The poor hot workability of duplex stainless steels increases dramatically the manufacturing cost and<br />

explains partly why the duplex stainless steel market is still limited. Thus, the purpose of this work is to<br />

understand the origin of the poor hot workability of these alloys and to suggest solutions to avoid or<br />

control the edge-cracking phenomenon.<br />

First of all, the main factors affecting the hot workability of duplex stainless steels are reviewed in or-<br />

der to identify the key parameters and to point out what are the missing pieces of the “hot workability<br />

puzzle”. The review reveals that two “pieces” are missing in the “puzzle”. On the one hand, it is neces-<br />

sary to develop a new hot ductility test which allows discriminating microstructures in terms of high<br />

temperature tearing resistance, and on the other hand, quantitative data about the strain partitioning<br />

between ferrite and austenite during the hot working operations are needed. These two parts must<br />

allow suggesting possible remedies for the edge cracking phenomenon. Figure I.10 gives a summary<br />

of the approach followed throughout this work.<br />

δ<br />

TD<br />

γ

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!