27.07.2021 Views

Kompendium 2020 Forschung & Klinik

Das Kompendium 2020 der Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie von MedUni Wien und AKH Wien (o. Univ.-Prof. R. Windhager) stellt einen umfassenden Überblick über die medizinsichen Leistungen und auch die umfangreichen Forschungsfelder dar. Die Veröffentlichungen zeigen die klinische Relevanz und innovative Ansätze der einzelnen Forschungsrichtungen. Herausgeber: Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie MedUni Wien und AKH Wien Prof. Dr. R. Windhager ISBN 978-3-200-07715-7

Das Kompendium 2020 der Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie von MedUni Wien und AKH Wien (o. Univ.-Prof. R. Windhager) stellt einen umfassenden Überblick über die medizinsichen Leistungen und auch die umfangreichen Forschungsfelder dar. Die Veröffentlichungen zeigen die klinische Relevanz und innovative Ansätze der einzelnen Forschungsrichtungen.

Herausgeber: Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
MedUni Wien und AKH Wien
Prof. Dr. R. Windhager

ISBN 978-3-200-07715-7

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TOP-Studien<br />

52<br />

The MOCART 2.0 Knee Score:<br />

Morphological MRI for the<br />

Assessment of Cartilage Repair<br />

„Orthopedic surgeons and radiologists<br />

with a special focus on musculoskeletal<br />

radiology and cartilage repair joint<br />

forces to develop a new and updated<br />

version of the original MOCART score,<br />

which would incorporate the developments<br />

in cartilage repair surgery and<br />

MR imaging alike. This culminated in<br />

the publication of the MOCART 2.0 knee<br />

score and atlas.“<br />

Markus Schreiner<br />

Symptomatic focal cartilage defects in young and active patients<br />

pose a significant challenge to the orthopedic surgeon. Left untreated,<br />

focal cartilage defects may increase in size and ultimately<br />

progress to OA. With an increasing number of different surgical<br />

techniques and scaffolds having become available, the comparison<br />

of clinical outcome between these techniques becomes<br />

increasingly important.<br />

While clinical scores provide information on the overall joint-health and<br />

patient satisfaction, morphological and quantitative MRI may provide<br />

additional information on the status of the repair tissue. The qualitative and<br />

quantitative assessment of cartilage repair tissue has been the focus of the<br />

interdisciplinary research group between the Department for Orthopedics<br />

and Trauma surgery and the High-Field MR Center of the Medical University<br />

of Vienna for some time and lead to the introduction of the MOCART (Magnetic<br />

Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) score.<br />

Study:<br />

Schreiner MM, Raudner M,<br />

Marlovits S, Bohndorf K,<br />

Weber M, Zalaudek M, Röhrich<br />

S, Szomolanyi P, Filardo G,<br />

Windhager R, Trattnig S.<br />

The MOCART (Magnetic Resonance<br />

Observation of Cartilage<br />

Repair Tissue) 2.0 Knee Score<br />

and Atlas. Cartilage. 2019 Aug<br />

17:1947603519865308. doi:<br />

10.1177/1947603519865308.<br />

[Epub ahead of print]<br />

However, since the introduction of the MOCART 2.0 knee score, MRI hardware<br />

as well as MR sequences evolved. Similarly, surgical cartilage repair<br />

techniques were refined, and the MOCART score did not reflect these new<br />

developments. In addition, continuous use of the score for more than a<br />

decade exposed some weaknesses of the scoring system. Hence, orthopedic<br />

surgeons and radiologists with a special focus on musculoskeletal radiology<br />

and cartilage repair joint forces to develop a new and updated version of the<br />

original MOCART score, which would incorporate the developments in cartilage<br />

repair surgery and MR imaging alike. This culminated in the publication<br />

of the MOCART 2.0 knee score and atlas.<br />

Main improvements of the score<br />

The main improvements of the score include the elimination of the assessment<br />

of adhesions, the variable „subchondral lamina“, and the variable<br />

„synovitis“. Regarding the variables that were adapted, the variable „volume<br />

of cartilage defect filling“ now allows for a more precise evaluation of defect<br />

filling in 25% increments. Furthermore, hypertrophic filling of up to 150%<br />

being is now being scored with the same scoring as complete repair, as it has<br />

been previously shown that minor hypertrophy has no detrimental effects<br />

on clinical symptoms or long-term outcome. The variable „integration“<br />

was changed in a way that it now only assesses integration to neighboring

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!