27.07.2021 Views

Kompendium 2020 Forschung & Klinik

Das Kompendium 2020 der Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie von MedUni Wien und AKH Wien (o. Univ.-Prof. R. Windhager) stellt einen umfassenden Überblick über die medizinsichen Leistungen und auch die umfangreichen Forschungsfelder dar. Die Veröffentlichungen zeigen die klinische Relevanz und innovative Ansätze der einzelnen Forschungsrichtungen. Herausgeber: Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie MedUni Wien und AKH Wien Prof. Dr. R. Windhager ISBN 978-3-200-07715-7

Das Kompendium 2020 der Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie von MedUni Wien und AKH Wien (o. Univ.-Prof. R. Windhager) stellt einen umfassenden Überblick über die medizinsichen Leistungen und auch die umfangreichen Forschungsfelder dar. Die Veröffentlichungen zeigen die klinische Relevanz und innovative Ansätze der einzelnen Forschungsrichtungen.

Herausgeber: Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
MedUni Wien und AKH Wien
Prof. Dr. R. Windhager

ISBN 978-3-200-07715-7

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TOP-Studien<br />

64<br />

Figure 2: Box plots representing the ultimate<br />

load to failure, in Newton, per screw.<br />

The horizontal line indicates the median,<br />

the box extends from the 25th to the 75th<br />

percentile, and the bars indicate the largest<br />

and smallest observed value.<br />

early active rehabilitation. After completion of cyclic loading, an ultimate<br />

load to failure test was performed. Failure was defined as gross failure due<br />

to fracture, screw bending or breakage, or dorsal angulation of the distal<br />

fragment exceeding 10°. Stiffness (slope), displacement, angulation, and<br />

ultimate loads were compared between both groups. Modes of failure were<br />

classified and analyzed with reference to screw type.<br />

Results<br />

There was no significant difference in stiffness and machine displacement<br />

between fifth metatarsals fixed with the solid Jones Fracture-specific<br />

screw (JFXS group) or the cannulated headless compression screw (HCS<br />

group) at any point during the cyclic loading (stiffness:0.324 ≤ p ≤ 0.986;<br />

displacement: 0.131 ≤ p ≤ 0.635). Interfragmentary angulation increased<br />

from 1st to 1000st cycle in both groups, but not statistically significant.<br />

According to preliminary failure criteria, we found a construct survival of<br />

100% in the JFXS group and 90% in the HCS group during cyclic loading.<br />

Priv.-Doz. in Dr. in Madeleine Willegger, FEBOT<br />

Author:<br />

Madeleine Willegger started<br />

her career at the Department<br />

of Orthopaedics at the Medical<br />

University of Vienna in 2014.<br />

She is a specialist in Paediatric<br />

Orthopaedics and Foot and<br />

Ankle Surgery. Dr. Willegger is<br />

Fellow of the European Board<br />

of Orthopaedics and Trauma<br />

Surgery (FEBOT). Her research<br />

activity covers biomechanical<br />

and arthroscopic studies on the<br />

foot and ankle, evaluation of<br />

prognostic factors in soft tissue<br />

sarcoma, and clinical studies on<br />

lower limb rotation in children.<br />

The mean ultimate load to failure was 236.9 ± 107.8 N in the JFXS group<br />

compared with 210.8±150.7 N in the HCS group. Intergroup difference was<br />

not statistically significant (p = 0.429). The most common mode of failure<br />

in HCS constructs was proximal screw head cut out (n = 6, 60%), followed<br />

by loosening of the screw head (n = 3, 30%). In JFXS constructs metatarsal<br />

shaft fracture was the most observed mode of failure (n=4, 40%), followed<br />

by screw head cut out (n = 3, 30%). There was no statistically significant<br />

difference of BMD between the groups. BMD showed a positive correlation<br />

with the pooled ultimate load (R = 0.580, p = 0.007) for all constructs. It<br />

correlated negatively with angulation (angulation at first loading cycle:<br />

R=−0.676, p = 0.003), which was significant for every load cycle among<br />

all tested constructs (angulation at cycle 10: R=−0.552, p=0.002; cycle<br />

100–1,000: p≤0.001).<br />

Conclusion<br />

This biomechanical study shows that both screw constructs (solid fracture-specific<br />

screws versus conventional cannulated headless compression<br />

screws) provide equal ultimate loads and stiffness in a Jones<br />

fracture fixation model. In addition, low BMD seems to be related to a<br />

diminished primary stability and impaired ultimate load in intramedullary<br />

Jones fracture fixation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!