06.09.2021 Views

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

France 6 0 3 8<br />

World Total 24 24 8 8<br />

In order for consumption of both goods to be higher in both countries, trade must occur. In the example,<br />

the United States is consuming five gallons of wine <strong>and</strong> producing none, so it must import the five gallons<br />

from France. France is consuming six pounds of cheese with no cheese production, so it must import the<br />

six pounds from the United States. The terms of trade is TOT = 5 gals./6 lbs., or 5/6 gals./lb.<br />

Exercise Conclusion<br />

The Ricardian model numerical example assumes that countries differ in their production technologies<br />

such that one of the countries is absolutely more productive than the other in the production of each of<br />

the two goods. If these two countries specialize in their comparative advantage good, then world<br />

production rises for both goods. Increased output occurs even though there is no increase in the amount<br />

of labor input in the world; thus the example demonstrates that specialization can raise world production<br />

efficiency. Because of the increase in output, it is possible to construct a terms of trade between the<br />

countries such that each country consumes more of each good with specialization <strong>and</strong> trade than was<br />

possible under autarky. Thus both countries can gain from trade. The surprising result of this example is<br />

that a country that is technologically inferior to another in the production of all goods can nevertheless<br />

benefit from trade with that country.<br />

Limitations of the Numerical Example<br />

A numerical example can display only one possible outcome for the model. As such, all conclusions should<br />

be viewed as possibilities rather than general results of the model. With further thought, there are some<br />

problems with the example. First, it is conceivable that with a different choice for the country’s autarky<br />

production <strong>and</strong> consumption points, world output might not rise for both goods upon specialization. In<br />

this case, we could not be sure that both countries would gain from trade. Second, since we merely made<br />

up a terms of trade that generated the interesting conclusion, we could ask whether a favorable terms of<br />

trade is likely to arise. Is it possible to make up a different terms of trade such that one country enjoys all<br />

the benefits of increased production while the other is made worse off? How can we be sure that this<br />

outcome would not arise? Finally, even if the country has more of both goods after trade, can we be sure<br />

that all consumers would have more of both goods? Perhaps some consumers would have more <strong>and</strong><br />

others less.<br />

Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books<br />

Saylor.org<br />

100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!