06.09.2021 Views

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

exchange. Thus the real wage of cheese workers in terms of wine rises. This means cheese workers are at<br />

least as well off in free trade as they were in autarky.<br />

The worst outcome occurs if a cheese worker has no dem<strong>and</strong> for wine. Perhaps an individual abstains<br />

from alcohol consumption. In this case, the worker would be able to buy just as much cheese in free trade<br />

as in autarky, but no more. Such a person would receive no benefit from free trade. However, every<br />

worker who dem<strong>and</strong>s both wine <strong>and</strong> cheese will be able to buy more of both goods.<br />

As for the workers who worked in the wine industry in the United States in autarky, they are now<br />

cheesemakers earning cheesemaker wages. Since real wages for wine workers were the same as wages for<br />

cheese workers in autarky, <strong>and</strong> since cheese workers are no worse off with free trade, then wine workers<br />

must also be no worse off in free trade. Of course, the model assumes that the movement of workers from<br />

one industry to another is costless. In the immobile factor model, we address the implications of<br />

adjustment costs across industries.<br />

In France, the real wage of winemakers in terms of how much wine they can buy remains constant, while<br />

the real wage in terms of cheese must go up. French cheesemakers have all become winemakers because<br />

of specialization, which means all French workers are no worse off <strong>and</strong> most likely better off as a result of<br />

free trade.<br />

The likely welfare effect of free trade, then, is that everyone in both trading countries benefits. At the very worst,<br />

some individuals will be just as well off as in autarky. This result occurs for any free trade price ratio that<br />

lies between the autarky price ratios.<br />

In David Ricardo’s original numerical example, he demonstrated that when both countries specialize in<br />

their comparative advantage goods <strong>and</strong> engage in free trade, both countries can experience gains from<br />

trade. However, his demonstration was only true for particular numerical values. By calculating real wage<br />

changes, it is shown that it doesn’t matter which price ratio emerges in free trade as long as it is between<br />

the autarky prices. Also, because all workers receive the same wage in each country, the real wage<br />

calculations tell us that everyone benefits equally in each country.<br />

Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books<br />

Saylor.org<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!