06.09.2021 Views

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

subsidies. Recall that export subsidies are subject to retaliation under the antisubsidy code but that<br />

requirement was negated for agricultural products. This enabled countries to keep prices for farm<br />

products high in the domestic market <strong>and</strong>, when those prices generated a surplus of food, to dump that<br />

surplus on international markets by using export subsidies.<br />

The result of this set of rules implemented worldwide was a severe distortion in agricultural markets <strong>and</strong><br />

numerous problems, especially for developing countries, whose producers would regularly be forced to<br />

compete with low-priced subsidized food for the developed world.<br />

The intention at the start of the Uruguay Round was a major reduction in tariffs <strong>and</strong> quotas <strong>and</strong> also in<br />

domestic support programs. Indeed, in the United States, the Reagan administration initially proposed a<br />

complete elimination of all trade-distorting subsidies to be phased in over a ten-year period. What<br />

ultimately was achieved was much more modest. The Uruguay Round agreement missed its deadlines<br />

several times because of the reluctance of some countries, especially the European Community (EC), to<br />

make many concessions to reduce agricultural subsidies.<br />

Countries did agree to one thing: to make a transition away from quota restrictions on agricultural<br />

commodity imports toward tariffs instead—a process called tariffication. The logic is that tariffs are more<br />

transparent <strong>and</strong> would be easier to negotiate downward in future World <strong>Trade</strong> Organization (WTO)<br />

rounds. A second concession countries made was to accept at least low levels of market access for<br />

important commodities. For many countries, important food products had prohibitive quotas in place. A<br />

prime example was the complete restriction on rice imports to Japan. The mechanism used to guarantee<br />

these minimum levels was to implement tariff-rate quotas. A tariff-rate quota sets a low tariff on a fixed<br />

quantity of imports <strong>and</strong> a high tariff on any imports over that quota. By setting the quota appropriately<br />

<strong>and</strong> setting a relatively low tariff on that amount, a country can easily meet its target minimum import<br />

levels.<br />

The General Agreement on <strong>Trade</strong> in Services (GATS)<br />

Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books<br />

Saylor.org<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!