06.09.2021 Views

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

United States maintains its free trade position, then a partial equilibrium welfare analysis suggests the<br />

following:<br />

1. Brazilian welfare will rise (we’ll assume from 100 to 120 units).<br />

2. U.S. welfare will fall (we’ll assume from 100 to 70 units).<br />

3. World welfare will fall (thus the sum of the U.S. <strong>and</strong> Brazilian welfare initially is 200 units but falls to 120 + 70 =<br />

190 afterward).<br />

Similarly, if the United States imposes optimal tariffs on all of its imports while Brazil maintains free<br />

trade, then the countries will realize the payoffs in the upper right-h<strong>and</strong> box. The United States would get<br />

120 units of welfare, while Brazil would get 70. To keep the example simple, we are assuming that the<br />

effects of tariffs are symmetric. In other words, the effect of U.S. optimal tariffs on the two countries is of<br />

the same magnitude as the effects of Brazilian tariffs.<br />

Finally, if both countries set optimal tariffs against each other, then we can simply sum up the total<br />

effects. Since each country’s actions raise its own welfare by 20 units <strong>and</strong> lower its trade partner’s welfare<br />

by 30 units, when both countries impose tariffs, national welfare falls to 90 units in each country.<br />

To determine which strategy the two governments would choose in this game, we need to identify the<br />

objectives of the players <strong>and</strong> the degree of cooperation. Initially, we will assume that each government is<br />

interested in maximizing its own national welfare <strong>and</strong> that the governments do not cooperate with each<br />

other. Afterward, we will consider the outcome when the governments do cooperate.<br />

The Noncooperative Solution (Nash Equilibrium)<br />

A noncooperative solution is a set of strategies such that each country maximizes its own national welfare<br />

subject to the strategy chosen by the other country. Thus, in general, if the U.S. strategy (r) maximizes<br />

U.S. welfare, when Brazil chooses its strategy (s) <strong>and</strong> if Brazil’s strategy (s) maximizes Brazil’s welfare<br />

when the United States chooses strategy (r), then the strategy set (r,s) is a noncooperative solution to the<br />

game. A noncooperative solution is also commonly known as a Nash equilibrium.<br />

How to Find a Nash Equilibrium<br />

One can determine a Nash equilibrium in a simple two-player, two-strategy game by choosing a strategy<br />

for one of the players <strong>and</strong> answering the following series of questions:<br />

1. Given the policy choice of the first player, what is the optimal policy of the second player?<br />

2. Given the policy choice of the second player (from step one), what is the first player’s optimal policy choice?<br />

Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books<br />

Saylor.org<br />

340

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!