06.09.2021 Views

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Free trade will raise aggregate welfare for both countries relative to autarky. Both countries are better off<br />

with free trade.<br />

EXERCISE<br />

1. Suppose each country specialized in the wrong good. Depict an equilibrium using the free trade prices in<br />

each country to show why national welfare would fall in free trade relative to autarky.<br />

2.12 Appendix: Robert Torrens on Comparative<br />

Advantage<br />

The first known statement of the principle of comparative advantage <strong>and</strong> trade appears in an article by<br />

Robert Torrens in 1815 titled Essay on the External Corn <strong>Trade</strong>. Torrens begins by describing the basic idea<br />

of absolute advantage as described by Adam Smith but goes on to suggest that the simple intuition is<br />

erroneous. He wrote,<br />

Suppose that there are in Engl<strong>and</strong>, unreclaimed districts, from which corn might be raised at<br />

as small an expense of labor <strong>and</strong> capital, as from the fertile plains of Pol<strong>and</strong>. This being the<br />

case, <strong>and</strong> all other things the same, the person who should cultivate our unreclaimed districts,<br />

could afford to sell his produce at as cheap a rate as the cultivator of Pol<strong>and</strong>: <strong>and</strong> it seems<br />

natural to conclude, that if industry were left to take its most profitable direction, capital would<br />

be employed in raising corn at home, rather than bringing it in from Pol<strong>and</strong> at an equal prime<br />

cost, <strong>and</strong> at much greater expense of carriage. But this conclusion, however obvious <strong>and</strong><br />

natural it may, at first sight, appear, might, on closer examination, be found entirely<br />

erroneous. If Engl<strong>and</strong> should have acquired such a degree of skill in manufactures, that, with<br />

any given portion of her capital, she could prepare a quantity of cloth, for which the Polish<br />

cultivator would give a greater quantity of corn, then she could, with the same portion of<br />

capital, raise from her own soil, then, tracts of her territory, though they should be equal, nay,<br />

even though they should be superior, to the l<strong>and</strong>s in Pol<strong>and</strong>, will be neglected; <strong>and</strong> a part of her<br />

supply of corn will be imported from that country.<br />

Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books<br />

Saylor.org<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!