06.09.2021 Views

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9.9 <strong>Trade</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Environment<br />

LEARNING OBJECTIVES<br />

1. Learn that environmental externalities are a type of market imperfection.<br />

2. Recognize that a trade policy can be used to correct for an environmental imperfection.<br />

3. Learn the first-best <strong>and</strong> second-best policy options to correct for an environmental<br />

imperfection.<br />

One contentious issue in international trade policy discussions concerns the connection between<br />

international trade <strong>and</strong> the environment. Many environmental groups claim that freer trade, as<br />

implemented through the World <strong>Trade</strong> Organization (WTO) agreements or in free trade agreements such<br />

as the North American Free <strong>Trade</strong> Agreement (NAFTA), results in negative environmental outcomes. For<br />

example, the Sierra Club argues, “Economic globalization ties the world together as never before. But it<br />

also poses serious new threats to our health <strong>and</strong> the environment. <strong>Trade</strong> agreements promote<br />

international commerce by limiting governments’ ability to act in the public interest. Already food safety,<br />

wildlife <strong>and</strong> pollution control laws have been challenged <strong>and</strong> weakened under trade rules as illegal<br />

‘barriers to trade.’” [1]<br />

In contrast, the WTO, a frequent target for criticism by environmental groups, points to the WTO<br />

agreement, which states, “[WTO member] relations in the field of trade <strong>and</strong> economic endeavor should be<br />

conducted with a view to raising st<strong>and</strong>ards of living…while allowing for the optimal use of the world’s<br />

resources in accordance with the objective of sustainable development, seeking both to protect <strong>and</strong><br />

preserve the environment <strong>and</strong> to enhance the means for doing so in a manner consistent with their<br />

respective needs <strong>and</strong> concerns at different levels of economic development.” [2]<br />

Arguably, the stated goals of free trade–oriented groups <strong>and</strong> environmental groups are very similar, at<br />

least as highlighted in the documents produced by both sides. What differ are the methods used to achieve<br />

the objectives. For reasons to be elucidated below, the WTO has argued that environmental concerns are<br />

not directly within the purview of the WTO agreement, but despite that, environmental policies <strong>and</strong><br />

international environmental agreements are neither prohibited by nor inconsistent with the WTO<br />

accords. In essence, the argument by some has been that the WTO agreement, <strong>and</strong> free trade agreements<br />

more generally, is intended to be about trade <strong>and</strong> is not intended to solve tangential problems related to<br />

Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books<br />

Saylor.org<br />

496

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!