06.09.2021 Views

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Thus it is always possible to find a free trade consumption point <strong>and</strong> an appropriate lump-sum<br />

compensation scheme such that everyone is at least as well off with trade as they had been in autarky.<br />

KEY TAKEAWAYS<br />

<br />

Because the sum of the benefits accruing to the winners exceeds the sum of the losses to the losers from<br />

free trade, it is possible to conceive of an income redistribution, or compensation, scheme that will assure<br />

that all individuals gain from trade.<br />

<br />

To avoid upsetting the optimal decisions made by producers <strong>and</strong> consumers in a free trade equilibrium,<br />

the most effective compensation scheme involves lump-sum transfers from winners to losers.<br />

<br />

Lump-sum transfers, although effective in theory, are virtually impossible to implement in practice.<br />

EXERCISES<br />

1. Jeopardy Questions. As in the popular television game show, you are given an answer to a<br />

question <strong>and</strong> you must respond with the question. For example, if the answer is “a tax on<br />

imports,” then the correct question is “What is a tariff?”<br />

1. The term used to describe a policy response that can alleviate the losses caused to<br />

some groups <strong>and</strong> assure that everyone gains from trade liberalization.<br />

2. Of points A, C1, or P1 in Figure 5.10 "Compensation in the H-O Model", this point provides<br />

the highest level of national welfare.<br />

Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books<br />

Saylor.org<br />

231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!