06.09.2021 Views

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

International Trade - Theory and Policy, 2010a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

prices, then the gross domestic product (GDP) will fluctuate along with the prices. Some years will be very<br />

good, <strong>and</strong> others will be very bad. Although a wealthier country may be able to smooth income by<br />

effectively using insurance programs, a poor country might face severe problems, perhaps as severe as<br />

famine, in years when the prices of their comparative advantage goods are depressed.<br />

In addition, many people argue that the management <strong>and</strong> organizational skills necessary to produce<br />

agricultural goods <strong>and</strong> natural resources are not the same as the skills <strong>and</strong> knowledge needed to build an<br />

industrial economy. If true, then concentrating production in one’s static comparative advantage goods<br />

would prevent the development of an industrial economy. Thus one of the reasons for protecting an infant<br />

industry is to stimulate the learning effects that will improve productive efficiency. Furthermore, these<br />

learning effects might spill over into the rest of the economy as managers <strong>and</strong> workers open new<br />

businesses or move to other industries in the economy. To the extent that there are positive spillovers or<br />

externalities in production, firms are unlikely to take account of these in their original decisions. Thus, if<br />

left alone, firms might produce too little of these types of goods <strong>and</strong> economic development would<br />

proceed less rapidly, if at all.<br />

The solution suggested by the infant industry argument is to protect the domestic industries from foreign<br />

competition in order to generate positive learning <strong>and</strong> spillover effects. Protection would stimulate<br />

domestic production <strong>and</strong> encourage more of these positive effects. As efficiency improves <strong>and</strong> other<br />

industries develop, economic growth is stimulated. Thus by protecting infant industries a government<br />

might facilitate more rapid economic growth <strong>and</strong> a much faster improvement in the country’s st<strong>and</strong>ard of<br />

living relative to specialization in the country’s static comparative advantage goods.<br />

An Analytical Example<br />

Consider the market for a manufactured good such as textiles in a small, less-developed country.<br />

Suppose that the supply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> curves in the country are as shown in Figure 9.2 "An Infant Industry in<br />

a Small Importing Country". Suppose initially free trade prevails <strong>and</strong> the world price of the good is P 1 . At<br />

that price, consumers would dem<strong>and</strong> D 1 , but the domestic supply curve is too high to warrant any<br />

production. This is the case, then, where domestic producers simply could not produce the product<br />

cheaply enough to compete with firms in the rest of the world. Thus the free trade level of imports would<br />

be given by the blue line segment, which is equal to domestic dem<strong>and</strong>, D 1 .<br />

Figure 9.2 An Infant Industry in a Small Importing Country<br />

Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books<br />

Saylor.org<br />

466

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!