23.09.2022 Views

The Gateway Chronicle 2020

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

61<br />

battle’, which resulted in Henry VI, Margaret<br />

of Anjou and Prince Edward fleeing<br />

to Scotland and the political<br />

nation accepting Edward as<br />

the rightful new king. However,<br />

in contrast, Henry VI,<br />

who did not achieve any domestic<br />

military success, was<br />

an especially weak king.<br />

Cade’s rebellion in 1450 further<br />

popularised the view of<br />

Henry as incompetent, for<br />

he did not even face the rebels<br />

and instead met many<br />

of their demands, while<br />

Henry’s passivity and weakness<br />

at the Battle of St Albans<br />

in<br />

1455, where he taken as a<br />

submissive prisoner by<br />

York, proved how an inability<br />

to achieve any personal<br />

military success was detrimental<br />

to a king’s jurisdiction<br />

in late medieval England.<br />

Foreign military success was<br />

also certainly key in securing the king’s<br />

authority through uniting the country,<br />

proving strong leadership and achieving<br />

material gains. Undoubtedly the most renowned<br />

foreign military victor was Henry<br />

V, who achieved extensive successes<br />

against the French in the Hundred Years<br />

War, particularly the Battle of Agincourt<br />

in 1415 and the conquest of Normandy<br />

from 1417-20.<br />

In a time<br />

when good<br />

kingship and<br />

military ability<br />

were inextricably<br />

linked,<br />

Henry V’s<br />

foreign military successes certainly restored<br />

the authority of his Lancastrian<br />

monarchy: it won the vast support of his<br />

subjects, convinced them that their taxes<br />

and prayers were bringing prestige and<br />

prosperity to England and therefore ensured<br />

domestic stability. Foreign military<br />

success also<br />

delivered the<br />

king additional<br />

patronage for<br />

him to both<br />

dispense in return<br />

for continued<br />

support<br />

from the nobility<br />

and bolster<br />

crown finances.<br />

In contrast,<br />

Henry VI’s<br />

complete lack<br />

of foreign military<br />

success<br />

certainly contributed<br />

to his<br />

weak authority.<br />

Gradually,<br />

Henry V’s victories<br />

in France<br />

were undone<br />

as Henry VI ignored<br />

the issue<br />

of France throughout his reign. <strong>The</strong> Battle<br />

of Castillon in 1453, which resulted in the<br />

loss of all lands in France except Calais,<br />

undoubtedly weakened the crown in<br />

many ways. Immediately, Henry VI lost a<br />

significant swathe of popular support, a<br />

fact which manifested itself in breakdown<br />

of law and order throughout the 1450s,<br />

particularly among returning veterans in<br />

the south-eastern epicentre<br />

that was<br />

Henry VI was viewed as a weak king, emphasised by<br />

his defeat at St Albans<br />

“Henry V’s foreign military successes<br />

certainly restored the authority of his<br />

Lancastrian monarchy”<br />

Kent. Prominent nobles<br />

also ceased to<br />

support Henry’s<br />

reign, such as York<br />

and Norfolk, which<br />

also severely reduced<br />

the crown’s<br />

authority by factionalising the nobility.<br />

<strong>The</strong> losses in France also created a serious<br />

financial problem: Henry was already indebted<br />

by a massive £372,000 by November<br />

1449, but now that France was lost and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!