GREEN SEED COAT COLOUR RETENTION IN LENTIL - University ...
GREEN SEED COAT COLOUR RETENTION IN LENTIL - University ...
GREEN SEED COAT COLOUR RETENTION IN LENTIL - University ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 5.7 Mean green index score of green lentil seed coats for the 15 genotypes<br />
used in the preharvest treatment study at SPG and Goodale for 2005 and 2006.<br />
Genotype<br />
Index Score<br />
2005 2006<br />
1294M-23* 4.99 2.99<br />
CDC Greenland 5.08 4.26<br />
CDC Grandora 5.12 4.21<br />
Laird 5.16 4.01<br />
CDC Glamis 5.31 4.25<br />
CDC Sedley 5.36 5.25<br />
CDC Richlea 5.42 4.68<br />
CDC Viceroy 5.44 4.28<br />
CDC Plato 5.54 5.04<br />
CDC Sovereign 5.72 4.54<br />
CDC Meteor 5.73 5.22<br />
Eston 5.83 4.49<br />
CDC Vantage 5.85 4.84<br />
1048-8R 6.05 5.12<br />
CDC Milestone 6.28 5.20<br />
LSD (0.05) 0.30 0.26<br />
* Denotes parent of the RILs used in the heritability study<br />
In almost all situations, swathing produced a more desired sample of green<br />
lentil. The only sample that had an equal or better score from the desiccated lentils<br />
was Eston in 2006, but this was not a significant difference (Figure 5.1). For 2006<br />
the mean score for swathing was also lower than the mean score for desiccation<br />
(Figure 5.2). In many of the other genotypes significant differences were noted in<br />
both 2005 and 2006 where swathing was significantly more green than desiccation<br />
with diquat (Figures 5.1 and 5.2). The differences between the mean of swathing<br />
and desiccation for each genotype were not the same for 2005 and 2006.<br />
69