Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>true</strong> <strong>hallucinations</strong>.<strong>htm</strong><br />
travel tune-up. While in the waiting room, I had read a several-months-old journal of some Canadian education association. In that journal,<br />
which I had not discussed with anyone, was a very short article about teaching-machines and very young children. The "Picture This" scenario<br />
with which the article opened was of a child looking at a figure-eight on a television screen, rolling it on its side, squeezing it together, etc.,<br />
etc. It was a bit of media flotsam that my brother, or something working through my brother, was able to lift right out of my mind weeks after<br />
I had forgotten it. Something was able to refashion and use our memories in whatever absurd way that it wished.<br />
"Now can we call that press conference, Bro?" Dennis inquired again from his hammock swinging hypnotically in the shadows.<br />
CHAPTER FOURTEEN<br />
LOOKING BACKWARD<br />
In which several miracles are recounted, not the least of which is the appearance of James and Nora Joyce disguised as poultry.<br />
Two MONTHS AFTER ALL of these experiences, around mid-May of 1971, I was moved to try to sum up the particularly bizarre and<br />
possibly physics-compromising incidents that I could then recall. Here is what I wrote at that time—a time when Iwas concerned to refute the<br />
idea that schizophrenia was a magic word explaining all that we had undergone:<br />
May 12,1971<br />
I have almost two months' perspective on the events surrounding our experience at La Chorrera, and I can clearly recognize that both my<br />
brother and I evinced the classic symptoms of the two generally distinguished categories of process schizophrenia. He appeared to manifest<br />
the withdrawn characteristics of essential schizophrenia while my behavior was of a more outward and paranoid sort. Nevertheless, I am<br />
unable to make the assumption that our experiment was therefore "nothing but" two simultaneously occurring cases of schizophrenia. With the<br />
full knowledge that such a position argues that I may still be experiencing residual<br />
symptoms of the illness, I maintain that we were in fact dealing with an objective phenomenon that, though of a highly peculiar nature<br />
inexorably bound up with psychic processes, does have its basis in the molecular ideas we were in the process of investigating. As empirical<br />
evidence of this viewpoint, I mention the following points, which seem to me to set our experience outside the realm of mental illness:<br />
The suddenness with which the symptoms developed following our actual experiment: Within a few minutes after we completed our preplanned<br />
experimental procedures, my brother began to disengage himself from the continuum of shared perceptions and at this same time I<br />
underwent a willing suspension of disbelief and began to experience the cybernetic unit that we had predicted would be a part of the effect we<br />
would cause if we were successful in our attempt to generate a superconducting genetic matrix and harmine bond.<br />
The integrated or dovetail aspect of our shared disassocia-tion: meaning that though both of us were exhibiting the symptoms of types of<br />
schizophrenia, the fantasy, the ideas, and the understanding which we were experiencing was shared. While my brother thought of me as the<br />
shaman messiah in all manifestations, I perceived him as the condensed mind-lens making a return journey across the universe that might have<br />
been one logical outcome of our experiment. Each of us alone would have given the clear appearance of being deluded; however, each of us<br />
seemed to offer elusive proof of the correctness of the other's position. I might add that though no one else could understand my brothers<br />
peculiar mental processes, I believed I could discern depth and an integrated understanding which seemed to be behind them—but at the same<br />
time I understood that his apparent lack of integration was due to the fact that his thinking was moving backward in some fundamental way. In<br />
the same way that a film running in reverse seems to present a spectacle of wild and irrational confusion, yet manages in the end to have<br />
things in their proper places, my brothers ideas and physical movement seemed to me to be simply the exact reverse of logical expectations.<br />
Dennis felt confident that the brain operates on the principle of a hologram. This was an idea originated by Karl Pribram, a<br />
neurophysiologist at Stanford, that was very much in vogue in our circles then. It neatly explains the fact that a large percentage of the<br />
physical brain can be damaged or removed with no impairment of memory, since a portion of a hologram contains all the information<br />
embedded in the larger whole from which it has been taken. Dennis had speculated before our experiment that he might receive a reverse<br />
image of my brain/mind organization for a brief time during the experiment. In listening to his free associations after the reversal, I became<br />
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/All%20Users/Doc...lture/True%20Hallucinations/<strong>true</strong>%20<strong>hallucinations</strong>.<strong>htm</strong> (64 of 106)4/14/2004 10:01:15 PM