02.02.2013 Views

Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap

Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap

Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Health</strong> <strong>Inequities</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Manitoba</strong>: <strong>Is</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Socioeconomic</strong> <strong>Gap</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Widen<strong>in</strong>g or Narrow<strong>in</strong>g Over Time?<br />

Rural compared to urban <strong>in</strong> most recent time period:<br />

• In <strong>the</strong> most recent time period T12, <strong>the</strong> G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient for rural neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tiles<br />

was statistically significantly higher than for urban neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tiles, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

greater level of <strong>in</strong>equality <strong>in</strong> rural compared to urban <strong>Manitoba</strong> for cont<strong>in</strong>uity of care.<br />

Disparity measures over time by rural and urban:<br />

• The disparity rate ratios (i.e., <strong>the</strong> ratio of <strong>the</strong> prevalence of cont<strong>in</strong>uity of care <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lowest compared<br />

to <strong>the</strong> highest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come group) are all below 1.00, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g less cont<strong>in</strong>uity of care<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lowest compared to <strong>the</strong> highest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tiles. The disparity rate ratios<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>ed stable over time for both rural and urban <strong>Manitoba</strong>. For most of <strong>the</strong> time periods, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

was no difference <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ratios between rural and urban, although for T6–T8 and T11 <strong>the</strong> ratios were<br />

greater (fur<strong>the</strong>r from 1.00) <strong>in</strong> rural compared to urban areas.<br />

• The disparity rate differences (DRD, i.e., <strong>the</strong> absolute difference of <strong>the</strong> prevalence of cont<strong>in</strong>uity<br />

of care between <strong>the</strong> lowest and highest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come group) show an uneven pattern<br />

over time for both rural and urban areas. In rural areas, <strong>the</strong>re was a significant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> absolute<br />

disparity (shown by numbers mov<strong>in</strong>g fur<strong>the</strong>r away from 0.0); but <strong>in</strong> urban areas, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease was not<br />

statistically significant. For all time periods, <strong>the</strong> absolute differences were greater <strong>in</strong> rural compared<br />

to urban areas (shown by DRDs fur<strong>the</strong>r away from 0.0).<br />

What is this tell<strong>in</strong>g us?<br />

• By some measures, <strong>the</strong> socioeconomic gap <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> prevalence of cont<strong>in</strong>uity of care is widen<strong>in</strong>g over<br />

time for rural <strong>Manitoba</strong>ns, whereas for o<strong>the</strong>r measures <strong>the</strong> prevalence rema<strong>in</strong>s stable over time.<br />

• By all measures, <strong>the</strong> socioeconomic gap <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> prevalence of cont<strong>in</strong>uity of care is stable over time for<br />

urban <strong>Manitoba</strong>ns.<br />

• By some, but not all, measures, <strong>the</strong> socioeconomic gap is greater <strong>in</strong> rural compared <strong>in</strong> urban<br />

<strong>Manitoba</strong>.<br />

• The socioeconomic gap for cont<strong>in</strong>uity of care is not very wide is rural areas and is even narrower <strong>in</strong><br />

urban areas.<br />

• The largest socioeconomic gap <strong>in</strong> prevalence of cont<strong>in</strong>uity of care is seen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last time period for<br />

rural <strong>Manitoba</strong>.<br />

Where to from here?<br />

• Absolute differences <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uity of care, as measured by <strong>the</strong> disparity rate differences (DRDs),<br />

appear to be grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rural <strong>Manitoba</strong>, even though <strong>the</strong> relative rates appear stable. Although<br />

access to physicians is universal across <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ce, <strong>the</strong>re may be barriers to access<strong>in</strong>g care, such<br />

as distance to physician and lack of transportation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower <strong>in</strong>come rural areas. Efforts should be<br />

made to reduce barriers to access, particularly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se areas.<br />

• The disparity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> prevalence of cont<strong>in</strong>uity of care is relatively small <strong>in</strong> both rural and urban areas.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> overall decrease <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uity of care <strong>in</strong> <strong>Manitoba</strong> is of concern and strategies to<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease cont<strong>in</strong>uity should be implemented, ensur<strong>in</strong>g that disparities do not <strong>in</strong>crease as a result of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se efforts.<br />

<strong>Manitoba</strong> Centre for <strong>Health</strong> Policy 117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!