02.02.2013 Views

Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap

Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap

Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6: Primary Care and Prevention<br />

124 University of <strong>Manitoba</strong><br />

This page edited May 18, 2011.<br />

Urban:<br />

• From T1 to T5, rates of hospitalizations due to tuberculosis dropped for U1, U2, and U3; it rose slightly<br />

for U4 and rema<strong>in</strong>ed stable for U5.<br />

• Depend<strong>in</strong>g upon <strong>the</strong> measure used, <strong>the</strong> disparity between U1 and U5 rema<strong>in</strong>ed similar or narrowed<br />

between <strong>the</strong> first and last time period for tuberculosis hospitalization rates. The rate ratio of U1<br />

compared to U5 was 14.46 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first time period and 9.43 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last time period; this decrease is<br />

not statistically significantly different. The absolute difference gap <strong>in</strong> tuberculosis hospitalization<br />

rates compar<strong>in</strong>g U1 to U5 decreased over <strong>the</strong> study period; 35.20 per 100,000 more tuberculosis<br />

hospitalizations <strong>in</strong> U1 compared to U5 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first time period, and 19.19 more per 100,000 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last<br />

time period, for a statistically significant decrease of 45%.<br />

Lorenz Curves:<br />

Rural over time:<br />

• In T1, 40.9% of tuberculosis hospitalizations were accounted for <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 20.0% of <strong>the</strong> rural population<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lowest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile group (R1), with <strong>the</strong> G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient of 0.260 <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a statistically significant (and large) <strong>in</strong>equality.<br />

• In T5, 57.2% of <strong>the</strong> tuberculosis hospitalizations were accounted for <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 19.9% of <strong>the</strong> population <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> lowest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile group (R1), with <strong>the</strong> G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient of 0.463 <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

statistically significant (and large) <strong>in</strong>equality.<br />

• The G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient from T1 to T5 <strong>in</strong>creased from 0.260 to 0.463, a statistically significant <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

(p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!