Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap
Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap
Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table E.1: Cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />
Indicator RURAL change over time URBAN change over time RURAL vs. URBAN<br />
DRR DRD G<strong>in</strong>i DRR DRD G<strong>in</strong>i DRR DRD G<strong>in</strong>i R vs. U<br />
Amputations due to Diabetes NS NS � NS NS NS NS Higher <strong>in</strong> NS<br />
(rate of amputations per<br />
rural<br />
T8<br />
1,000 people aged 19+ with T1: 2.00 T1: 13.9 T1: 0.138 T1: 2.53 T1: 11.3 T1: 0.170<br />
(s<strong>in</strong>ce T4)<br />
rural: 0.266<br />
diabetes)<br />
T8: 3.38 T8: 18.3 T8: 0.255 T8: 2.77 T8: 9.9 T8: 0.211<br />
urban: 0.211<br />
� (45%) � (422%) � NS � (196%) � NS Higher <strong>in</strong> NS<br />
<strong>Is</strong>chemic Heart Disease (% of<br />
urban T2;<br />
persons aged 19+ with a T1: 1.07 T1: 0.50 T1: 0.019 T1: 1.07 T1: 0.51 T1: 0.011<br />
higher <strong>in</strong> T8<br />
diagnosis of IHD)<br />
T8: 1.55 T8: 2.59 T8: 0.074 T8: 1.33 T8: 1.51 T8: 0.057<br />
rural T4, rural: 0.074<br />
T6-T8 urban: 0.057<br />
NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />
Multiple Sclerosis (persons<br />
except except at<br />
aged 16+ diagnosed with MS T1: 0.78 T1: T1: 0.042, T1: 0.99 T1: -2.3 T1: 0.010, at T4, T4, T4<br />
over a six-year period, per T4: 0.61 -45.3 NS T4: 0.96 T4: -10.7 NS where where rural: 0.054<br />
100,000 persons aged 16+)<br />
T4: T4: 0.054<br />
T4: 0.008, greater greater <strong>in</strong> urban: 0.008<br />
-110.9<br />
NS <strong>in</strong> rural rural<br />
xxii University of <strong>Manitoba</strong><br />
NS<br />
NS<br />
NS<br />
�<br />
Chapter 6: Primary Care and Prevention<br />
NS � (26%)<br />
Greater<br />
<strong>in</strong>equality <strong>in</strong><br />
rural<br />
Greater<br />
gap <strong>in</strong><br />
rural<br />
T12<br />
rural:<br />
0.037<br />
urban: 0.016<br />
NS<br />
NS to<br />
mid-<br />
1990s;<br />
very<br />
slightly<br />
greater<br />
<strong>in</strong> rural<br />
after<br />
T1: 0.015<br />
T12: 0.016<br />
T1: -5.76<br />
T12:<br />
-5.99<br />
T1: 0.93<br />
T12:<br />
0.92<br />
T1: 0.026<br />
T12: 0.037<br />
T1:<br />
-9.31<br />
T12:<br />
-11.70<br />
T1: 0.88<br />
T12:<br />
0.83<br />
Cont<strong>in</strong>uity of Care (% of<br />
population hav<strong>in</strong>g at least<br />
50% of <strong>the</strong>ir physician visits<br />
over a two-year period to <strong>the</strong><br />
same physician)**<br />
This page edited May 18, 2011.<br />
NS<br />
except at<br />
T5 where<br />
rural is<br />
greater<br />
NS<br />
NS<br />
� (45%)<br />
NS<br />
�<br />
↑(83%)<br />
�(114%)<br />
T5<br />
rural: 0.463<br />
urban: 0.401<br />
except<br />
at T1<br />
where<br />
urban is<br />
higher<br />
NS or<br />
slightly<br />
greater<br />
<strong>in</strong> rural<br />
T1: 0.496<br />
T5: 0.401<br />
T1: 35.20<br />
T5: 19.19<br />
T1:14.46<br />
T5: 9.43<br />
T1: 0.260<br />
T5: 0.463<br />
T1: 26.22<br />
T5: 47.91<br />
T1: 2.72<br />
T5: 5.83<br />
Hospitalizations for TB<br />
(average annual rate of<br />
persons per 100,000 who<br />
were hospitalized for TB)<br />
Greater<br />
<strong>in</strong>equality <strong>in</strong><br />
rural<br />
Mostly<br />
greater <strong>in</strong><br />
rural<br />
�<br />
� (27%)<br />
NS<br />
�<br />
� (53%)<br />
� (12%)<br />
T1: 0.033<br />
T8: 0.041<br />
T1: 0.84<br />
T8: 0.80<br />
T1: 0.035<br />
T8: 0.059<br />
T1: 0.82<br />
T8: 0.72<br />
Cervical Cancer Screen<strong>in</strong>g (%<br />
females aged 18-69 hav<strong>in</strong>g at<br />
least one Pap test over three<br />
years)**<br />
T8<br />
rural: 0.059<br />
urban: 0.041<br />
T1:<br />
-11.55<br />
T8:<br />
-14.62<br />
T1:<br />
-12.03<br />
T8:<br />
-18.37