02.02.2013 Views

Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap

Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap

Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Health</strong> <strong>Inequities</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Manitoba</strong>: <strong>Is</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Socioeconomic</strong> <strong>Gap</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Widen<strong>in</strong>g or Narrow<strong>in</strong>g Over Time?<br />

Dental Extraction<br />

Def<strong>in</strong>ition<br />

The removal of a tooth from <strong>the</strong> mouth. In this report, hospital–based dental extraction rates are<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ed for children up to five years of age, when severe tooth decay is <strong>the</strong> most common reason for<br />

dental extractions. This is <strong>the</strong> average annual rate of hospitalizations for dental extractions per 1,000<br />

children aged birth to five years. The follow<strong>in</strong>g codes to identify hospital–based dental extractions were<br />

used:<br />

ICD–9–CM codes: 23.01 (extraction of deciduous tooth), 23.09 (extraction of o<strong>the</strong>r tooth), 23.11 (removal<br />

of residual root), and 23.19 (o<strong>the</strong>r surgical extraction of tooth).<br />

ICD–10–CA codes: 1.FE.89 (total excision, <strong>in</strong>cludes excision (surgical) tooth, excision tooth (impacted)<br />

and enucleation tooth (non erupted)) and 1.FE.57 (tooth extraction, <strong>in</strong>cludes tooth removal, us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

forceps).<br />

A limitation with this measure is that dental extractions performed <strong>in</strong> a surgery cl<strong>in</strong>ic or a private<br />

dentist’s office cannot be identified.<br />

NOTE: Dental Extractions as an <strong>in</strong>dicator may be considered a surrogate for underly<strong>in</strong>g severe tooth<br />

decay. This is an <strong>in</strong>stance where <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>equality (i.e., higher dental surgery rates <strong>in</strong> lower socioeconomic<br />

groups) may actually be equity (i.e., a fair distribution of health services accord<strong>in</strong>g to underly<strong>in</strong>g need).<br />

Time Periods Average annual rate per 1,000<br />

T1: 1984/85–1988/89 5.56<br />

T2: 1989/90–1993/94 5.99<br />

T3: 1994/95–1998/99 8.75<br />

T4: 1999/00–2003/04 12.95<br />

T5: 2004/05–2007/08 17.06<br />

Key F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs: Dental Extractions<br />

<strong>Manitoba</strong> overall rates:<br />

From <strong>the</strong> first time period T1 (1984/85–1988/89) to <strong>the</strong> last time period T5 (2004/05–2007/08), rates of<br />

hospital–based dental extractions have <strong>in</strong>creased dramatically <strong>in</strong> <strong>Manitoba</strong>, from 5.56 per 1,000 to 17.06<br />

per 1,000 children under age five.<br />

Rates by neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile over time:<br />

Rural:<br />

• From T1 to T5, <strong>the</strong> dental extraction rate among rural residents <strong>in</strong>creased for all rural qu<strong>in</strong>tiles. The<br />

most substantial <strong>in</strong>creases occurred <strong>in</strong> R1 and R2, <strong>the</strong> two lowest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

groups. R1 went from 19.21 per 1,000 <strong>in</strong> T1 to 59.51 dental extractions per child under age five <strong>in</strong> T5.<br />

R2 saw an <strong>in</strong>crease of 8.65 per 1,000 <strong>in</strong> T1 to 37.95 <strong>in</strong> T5.<br />

<strong>Manitoba</strong> Centre for <strong>Health</strong> Policy 63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!