02.02.2013 Views

Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap

Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap

Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4: Child <strong>Health</strong><br />

56 University of <strong>Manitoba</strong><br />

• The disparity between R1 and R5 showed an absolute <strong>in</strong>crease but no relative change. The rate ratio<br />

of R1 compared to R5 was 0.63 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first time period and 0.60 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last time period, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

stability <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rate ratio between R1 and R5 over time. The absolute difference gap of high school<br />

completion compar<strong>in</strong>g R1 to R5 statistically significantly <strong>in</strong>creased by 19% over time. R1 had around<br />

28 per 100 fewer high school graduates than R5 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first time period. By <strong>the</strong> last time period, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

were around 34 per 100 fewer graduates <strong>in</strong> R1 compared to R5.<br />

Urban:<br />

• From T1 to T7, <strong>the</strong> high school completion rates of urban neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile groups U2<br />

to U5 fluctuated but showed slight <strong>in</strong>creases over time. For U1, <strong>the</strong> lowest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come<br />

qu<strong>in</strong>tile group, <strong>the</strong> rate showed a slight decrease over time.<br />

• The disparity between U1 and U5 <strong>in</strong>creased significantly. The rate ratio of U1 compared to U5 was<br />

0.61 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first time period and 0.56 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last time period, for a statistically significant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>equality of 8%. The absolute difference <strong>in</strong> high school completion rates compar<strong>in</strong>g U1 to U5 went<br />

from –34.67 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first time period to –41.07, a statistically significant <strong>in</strong>crease of 18%, represent<strong>in</strong>g<br />

around 35 per 100 fewer high school graduates <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first time period compared to 41 fewer<br />

graduates per 100 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last time period.<br />

Lorenz Curves:<br />

Rural over time:<br />

• In <strong>the</strong> first time period T1, 12.9% of <strong>the</strong> high school graduates were <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 18.5% of <strong>the</strong> population <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> lowest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile group R1, with <strong>the</strong> G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient of 0.069 <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

statistically significant disparity.<br />

• In <strong>the</strong> last time period T7, 13.9% of <strong>the</strong> high school graduates were <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 19.9% of <strong>the</strong> population <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> lowest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile group R1, with <strong>the</strong> G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient of 0.079 <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

statistically significant disparity.<br />

• The G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient did not change significantly from first to <strong>the</strong> last time period, suggest<strong>in</strong>g stability<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>equality over that time period.<br />

Urban over time:<br />

• In <strong>the</strong> first time period T1, 11.3% of <strong>the</strong> high school graduates were <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 15.8% of <strong>the</strong> population <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> lowest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile group U1, with <strong>the</strong> G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient of 0.089 <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

statistically significant disparity.<br />

• In <strong>the</strong> last time period T7, 11.0% of <strong>the</strong> high school graduates were <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 16.5% of <strong>the</strong> population <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> lowest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile group U1, with <strong>the</strong> G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient of 0.098 <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

statistically significant disparity.<br />

• The G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient was not statistically significantly different over <strong>the</strong> two time po<strong>in</strong>ts, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>equality <strong>in</strong> high school completion stayed similar over time <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> urban areas.<br />

Rural compared to urban <strong>in</strong> most recent time period:<br />

• In <strong>the</strong> most recent time period T7, <strong>the</strong>re was a statistically similar G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient <strong>in</strong> rural compared<br />

to urban (0.079 vs. 0.098), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a similar level of <strong>in</strong>equality <strong>in</strong> both rural and urban <strong>Manitoba</strong> for<br />

high school completion rates.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!