Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap
Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap
Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 4: Child <strong>Health</strong><br />
56 University of <strong>Manitoba</strong><br />
• The disparity between R1 and R5 showed an absolute <strong>in</strong>crease but no relative change. The rate ratio<br />
of R1 compared to R5 was 0.63 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first time period and 0.60 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last time period, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
stability <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rate ratio between R1 and R5 over time. The absolute difference gap of high school<br />
completion compar<strong>in</strong>g R1 to R5 statistically significantly <strong>in</strong>creased by 19% over time. R1 had around<br />
28 per 100 fewer high school graduates than R5 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first time period. By <strong>the</strong> last time period, <strong>the</strong>re<br />
were around 34 per 100 fewer graduates <strong>in</strong> R1 compared to R5.<br />
Urban:<br />
• From T1 to T7, <strong>the</strong> high school completion rates of urban neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile groups U2<br />
to U5 fluctuated but showed slight <strong>in</strong>creases over time. For U1, <strong>the</strong> lowest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come<br />
qu<strong>in</strong>tile group, <strong>the</strong> rate showed a slight decrease over time.<br />
• The disparity between U1 and U5 <strong>in</strong>creased significantly. The rate ratio of U1 compared to U5 was<br />
0.61 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first time period and 0.56 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last time period, for a statistically significant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>equality of 8%. The absolute difference <strong>in</strong> high school completion rates compar<strong>in</strong>g U1 to U5 went<br />
from –34.67 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first time period to –41.07, a statistically significant <strong>in</strong>crease of 18%, represent<strong>in</strong>g<br />
around 35 per 100 fewer high school graduates <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first time period compared to 41 fewer<br />
graduates per 100 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last time period.<br />
Lorenz Curves:<br />
Rural over time:<br />
• In <strong>the</strong> first time period T1, 12.9% of <strong>the</strong> high school graduates were <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 18.5% of <strong>the</strong> population <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> lowest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile group R1, with <strong>the</strong> G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient of 0.069 <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
statistically significant disparity.<br />
• In <strong>the</strong> last time period T7, 13.9% of <strong>the</strong> high school graduates were <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 19.9% of <strong>the</strong> population <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> lowest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile group R1, with <strong>the</strong> G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient of 0.079 <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
statistically significant disparity.<br />
• The G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient did not change significantly from first to <strong>the</strong> last time period, suggest<strong>in</strong>g stability<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>equality over that time period.<br />
Urban over time:<br />
• In <strong>the</strong> first time period T1, 11.3% of <strong>the</strong> high school graduates were <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 15.8% of <strong>the</strong> population <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> lowest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile group U1, with <strong>the</strong> G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient of 0.089 <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
statistically significant disparity.<br />
• In <strong>the</strong> last time period T7, 11.0% of <strong>the</strong> high school graduates were <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 16.5% of <strong>the</strong> population <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> lowest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile group U1, with <strong>the</strong> G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient of 0.098 <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
statistically significant disparity.<br />
• The G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient was not statistically significantly different over <strong>the</strong> two time po<strong>in</strong>ts, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>equality <strong>in</strong> high school completion stayed similar over time <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> urban areas.<br />
Rural compared to urban <strong>in</strong> most recent time period:<br />
• In <strong>the</strong> most recent time period T7, <strong>the</strong>re was a statistically similar G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient <strong>in</strong> rural compared<br />
to urban (0.079 vs. 0.098), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a similar level of <strong>in</strong>equality <strong>in</strong> both rural and urban <strong>Manitoba</strong> for<br />
high school completion rates.