Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap
Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap
Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 2: A Description of <strong>the</strong> Neighbourhood Income Qu<strong>in</strong>tiles us<strong>in</strong>g Census Data<br />
22 University of <strong>Manitoba</strong><br />
to be <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> average household <strong>in</strong>come faster than <strong>the</strong> lowest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />
group. The colloquial statement, <strong>the</strong> “rich are gett<strong>in</strong>g richer”, is born out <strong>in</strong> various measures of disparity,<br />
both <strong>in</strong> urban and rural <strong>Manitoba</strong>. One qualifier to this analysis is that <strong>the</strong> average census household<br />
<strong>in</strong>come is not adjusted for <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> household itself.<br />
Trends <strong>in</strong> percentage complet<strong>in</strong>g high school over time, by neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />
Table 2.5: Change <strong>in</strong> Percentage Complet<strong>in</strong>g High School over Census Years 1986, 1996,<br />
Table 2.5: 2006 Change <strong>in</strong> Percentage Complet<strong>in</strong>g High School over Census Years 1986, 1996, 2006<br />
Area Measure<br />
Rural<br />
Urban<br />
High School<br />
Completion<br />
Rates for<br />
R1 and R5<br />
Disparity Rate<br />
Ratio (R5/R1)<br />
Disparity Rate<br />
Difference<br />
(R5-R1)<br />
High School<br />
Completion<br />
Rates for<br />
U1 and U5<br />
Disparity Rate<br />
Ratio (U5/U1)<br />
Disparity Rate<br />
Difference<br />
(U5-U1)<br />
Census Date<br />
T1: 1986 T2: 1996 T3: 2006<br />
R1: 25.1%<br />
R5: 49.6%<br />
R1: 36.7%<br />
R5: 61.7%<br />
R1: 43.9%<br />
R5: 72.3%<br />
Comparison<br />
over time: T3<br />
to T1 (T3/T1)<br />
(2006 to 1986)<br />
R1: 1.75<br />
R5: 1.46<br />
1.98 1.68 1.65 0.83<br />
24.5% 25.0% 28.4% 1.16<br />
U1: 44.3%<br />
U5: 68.0%<br />
U1: 52.4%<br />
U5: 77.3%<br />
U1: 68.2%<br />
U5: 84.6%<br />
U1: 1.54<br />
U5: 1.24<br />
1.53 1.48 1.24 0.81<br />
23.7% 24.9% 16.4% 0.69<br />
Source: <strong>Manitoba</strong> Centre for <strong>Health</strong> Policy, 2010<br />
In rural neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile groups, <strong>the</strong> high school completion rate was almost double<br />
(1.98 times) <strong>in</strong> R5 compared to R1 <strong>in</strong> 1986, but 1.65 times higher <strong>in</strong> 2006. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> rate ratio is<br />
decreas<strong>in</strong>g over time by 17% (T3/T1=0.83). That be<strong>in</strong>g said, as <strong>the</strong> high school completion levels go<br />
up for all rural neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile groups, <strong>the</strong> rate difference slightly <strong>in</strong>creased over time,<br />
from a difference of 24.5% to 28.4% (28.4/24.5=1.16 or a 16% <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rate difference). Look<strong>in</strong>g at<br />
Tables 2.1 through 2.3, one can see <strong>the</strong> high school completion rates have <strong>in</strong>creased dramatically for R1,<br />
from 25.1% complet<strong>in</strong>g high school <strong>in</strong> 1986 to 43.9% <strong>in</strong> 2006 and for R5 dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> same time period,<br />
49.6% <strong>in</strong> 1986 to 72.3% <strong>in</strong> 2006.<br />
In urban areas, both <strong>the</strong> relative and rate differences are decreas<strong>in</strong>g over time. The rate ratio displays<br />
1.53 times <strong>the</strong> high school completion rate for U5 compared to U1 <strong>in</strong> 1986, but only 1.24 times <strong>in</strong> 2006,<br />
for a 19% decrease (ratio 0.81) <strong>in</strong> disparity over time. Concurrently, <strong>the</strong> absolute difference <strong>in</strong> high<br />
school completion rates dropped from 23.7% <strong>in</strong> 1986 to 16.4% difference <strong>in</strong> 2006, for a 31% decrease<br />
(ratio 0.69) over time. Look<strong>in</strong>g at Tables 2.1 through 2.3, one can see that <strong>the</strong> high school completion<br />
rates have <strong>in</strong>creased dramatically for U1, from 44.3% to 68.2% complet<strong>in</strong>g high school <strong>in</strong> 1986 and 2006<br />
respectively. For U5, <strong>the</strong> rates went up from 68.0% to 84.6% over <strong>the</strong> same time period.