02.02.2013 Views

Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap

Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap

Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2: A Description of <strong>the</strong> Neighbourhood Income Qu<strong>in</strong>tiles us<strong>in</strong>g Census Data<br />

22 University of <strong>Manitoba</strong><br />

to be <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> average household <strong>in</strong>come faster than <strong>the</strong> lowest neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

group. The colloquial statement, <strong>the</strong> “rich are gett<strong>in</strong>g richer”, is born out <strong>in</strong> various measures of disparity,<br />

both <strong>in</strong> urban and rural <strong>Manitoba</strong>. One qualifier to this analysis is that <strong>the</strong> average census household<br />

<strong>in</strong>come is not adjusted for <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> household itself.<br />

Trends <strong>in</strong> percentage complet<strong>in</strong>g high school over time, by neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

Table 2.5: Change <strong>in</strong> Percentage Complet<strong>in</strong>g High School over Census Years 1986, 1996,<br />

Table 2.5: 2006 Change <strong>in</strong> Percentage Complet<strong>in</strong>g High School over Census Years 1986, 1996, 2006<br />

Area Measure<br />

Rural<br />

Urban<br />

High School<br />

Completion<br />

Rates for<br />

R1 and R5<br />

Disparity Rate<br />

Ratio (R5/R1)<br />

Disparity Rate<br />

Difference<br />

(R5-R1)<br />

High School<br />

Completion<br />

Rates for<br />

U1 and U5<br />

Disparity Rate<br />

Ratio (U5/U1)<br />

Disparity Rate<br />

Difference<br />

(U5-U1)<br />

Census Date<br />

T1: 1986 T2: 1996 T3: 2006<br />

R1: 25.1%<br />

R5: 49.6%<br />

R1: 36.7%<br />

R5: 61.7%<br />

R1: 43.9%<br />

R5: 72.3%<br />

Comparison<br />

over time: T3<br />

to T1 (T3/T1)<br />

(2006 to 1986)<br />

R1: 1.75<br />

R5: 1.46<br />

1.98 1.68 1.65 0.83<br />

24.5% 25.0% 28.4% 1.16<br />

U1: 44.3%<br />

U5: 68.0%<br />

U1: 52.4%<br />

U5: 77.3%<br />

U1: 68.2%<br />

U5: 84.6%<br />

U1: 1.54<br />

U5: 1.24<br />

1.53 1.48 1.24 0.81<br />

23.7% 24.9% 16.4% 0.69<br />

Source: <strong>Manitoba</strong> Centre for <strong>Health</strong> Policy, 2010<br />

In rural neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile groups, <strong>the</strong> high school completion rate was almost double<br />

(1.98 times) <strong>in</strong> R5 compared to R1 <strong>in</strong> 1986, but 1.65 times higher <strong>in</strong> 2006. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> rate ratio is<br />

decreas<strong>in</strong>g over time by 17% (T3/T1=0.83). That be<strong>in</strong>g said, as <strong>the</strong> high school completion levels go<br />

up for all rural neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile groups, <strong>the</strong> rate difference slightly <strong>in</strong>creased over time,<br />

from a difference of 24.5% to 28.4% (28.4/24.5=1.16 or a 16% <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rate difference). Look<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

Tables 2.1 through 2.3, one can see <strong>the</strong> high school completion rates have <strong>in</strong>creased dramatically for R1,<br />

from 25.1% complet<strong>in</strong>g high school <strong>in</strong> 1986 to 43.9% <strong>in</strong> 2006 and for R5 dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> same time period,<br />

49.6% <strong>in</strong> 1986 to 72.3% <strong>in</strong> 2006.<br />

In urban areas, both <strong>the</strong> relative and rate differences are decreas<strong>in</strong>g over time. The rate ratio displays<br />

1.53 times <strong>the</strong> high school completion rate for U5 compared to U1 <strong>in</strong> 1986, but only 1.24 times <strong>in</strong> 2006,<br />

for a 19% decrease (ratio 0.81) <strong>in</strong> disparity over time. Concurrently, <strong>the</strong> absolute difference <strong>in</strong> high<br />

school completion rates dropped from 23.7% <strong>in</strong> 1986 to 16.4% difference <strong>in</strong> 2006, for a 31% decrease<br />

(ratio 0.69) over time. Look<strong>in</strong>g at Tables 2.1 through 2.3, one can see that <strong>the</strong> high school completion<br />

rates have <strong>in</strong>creased dramatically for U1, from 44.3% to 68.2% complet<strong>in</strong>g high school <strong>in</strong> 1986 and 2006<br />

respectively. For U5, <strong>the</strong> rates went up from 68.0% to 84.6% over <strong>the</strong> same time period.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!