Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap
Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap
Health Inequities in Manitoba: Is the Socioeconomic Gap
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Health</strong> <strong>Inequities</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Manitoba</strong>: <strong>Is</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Socioeconomic</strong> <strong>Gap</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Widen<strong>in</strong>g or Narrow<strong>in</strong>g Over Time?<br />
<strong>Is</strong>chemic Heart Disease (IHD)<br />
<strong>Is</strong>chemia is a condition <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> blood flow (and thus oxygen) is restricted to a part of <strong>the</strong> body.<br />
Cardiac ischemia is <strong>the</strong> name for lack of blood flow and oxygen to <strong>the</strong> heart muscle. Thus, <strong>the</strong> term<br />
‘ischemic heart disease’ refers to heart problems caused by narrowed heart arteries. When arteries are<br />
narrowed, less blood and oxygen reaches <strong>the</strong> heart muscle. This is also called coronary artery disease<br />
and coronary heart disease. It can ultimately lead to heart attack.<br />
In this study, <strong>the</strong> crude and adjusted prevalence of IHD was measured for residents aged 19 and older<br />
over eight 3-year periods. Residents were considered to have IHD if <strong>the</strong>y met one of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
conditions:<br />
• one or more hospitalizations with a diagnosis of IHD: ICD–9–CM codes 410–414; ICD–10–CA codes<br />
I20–I22, I24, I25<br />
• two or more physician visits with a diagnosis of IHD (ICD–9–CM codes as above)<br />
The denom<strong>in</strong>ator <strong>in</strong>cludes all <strong>Manitoba</strong> residents aged 19 and older <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> specified time period.<br />
Lorenz Curve<br />
In this study, <strong>the</strong> Lorenz curve is a graphical display of <strong>the</strong> distribution of <strong>the</strong> cumulative percent<br />
of events by <strong>the</strong> cumulative percent of people <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> five neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tiles <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
population, by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>come. The horizontal axis (x–axis) of <strong>the</strong> curve displays <strong>the</strong> cumulative<br />
percent of people <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> population (by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile group) and <strong>the</strong><br />
vertical axis (y–axis) displays <strong>the</strong> cumulative percent of events <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> population. The Lorenz curve can<br />
be expressed as what percentage of <strong>the</strong> population represented by <strong>the</strong> neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />
holds what percentage of <strong>the</strong> events <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> population. Each neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile represents<br />
approximately 20% of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manitoba</strong> population, divided <strong>in</strong>to rural or urban (W<strong>in</strong>nipeg and Brandon).<br />
In a perfectly equitable situation, one would expect that 20% of events (i.e., premature deaths, teenage<br />
pregnancies, etc.) would occur <strong>in</strong> each <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile group: U1 would contribute 20% of all events<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> population; U2 would contribute ano<strong>the</strong>r 20% of all events <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> population and so forth. As a<br />
reference, a l<strong>in</strong>e of equality is also displayed on <strong>the</strong> graph to <strong>in</strong>dicate this perfectly equitable situation;<br />
however, most cases present some <strong>in</strong>equality between <strong>the</strong> percentage of events and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>come<br />
qu<strong>in</strong>tiles of <strong>the</strong> population. A Lorenz curve is generated when at least one of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tiles that<br />
captures N% of <strong>the</strong> population does not contribute <strong>the</strong> same N% on <strong>the</strong> Y axis. If a larger proportion of<br />
events occur <strong>in</strong> lower neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile groups, <strong>the</strong> Lorenz curve will bend above <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
of equality; if a larger proportion of events occur <strong>in</strong> higher neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile groups, <strong>the</strong><br />
Lorenz curve will bend below <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e of equality (Lorenz, 1905).<br />
The total area ly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>–between <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e of equality and <strong>the</strong> Lorenz curve is known as <strong>the</strong> GINI<br />
coefficient; larger areas represent larger disparities between neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come groups and<br />
smaller areas represent smaller disparities between neighbourhood <strong>in</strong>come groups. Please see G<strong>in</strong>i<br />
coefficient for more <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
On <strong>the</strong> next page is an example of a Lorenz curve. Here we see that U1 (lowest urban neighbourhood<br />
<strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile represent<strong>in</strong>g 19.5% of <strong>the</strong> population) accounts for 33.4% of all premature deaths.<br />
<strong>Manitoba</strong> Centre for <strong>Health</strong> Policy 201