Underwater Robots - Gianluca Antonelli.pdf
Underwater Robots - Gianluca Antonelli.pdf
Underwater Robots - Gianluca Antonelli.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
80 4. Fault Detection/Tolerance Strategies for AUVs and ROVs<br />
common concept is that, to overcome the loss of capability due to afailure, a<br />
kind of redundancy is required in the system. Ageneral scheme is presented<br />
in Figure 4.1.<br />
In this chapter, asurvey over existing fault detection and fault tolerant<br />
schemes for underwater vehicles ispresented. Forthese specific systems, adopting<br />
proper strategies, an hardware/software (HW/SW) sensor failure or<br />
an HW/SW thruster failure can besuccessfully handled indifferent operating<br />
conditions as it will be shown in next Sections. In some conditions, it is required<br />
that the fault detection scheme is also able to diagnostic some external<br />
not-nominal working conditions such asamulti-path phenomena affecting<br />
the echo-sounder system [61]. It is worth noticing that, for autonomous systems<br />
such asAUVs, space systems or aircraft, afault tolerant strategy is<br />
necessary to safely recover the damaged vehicle and, obviously, there isno<br />
panic button in the sense that the choice ofturning off the power oractivate<br />
some kind of brakes is not available.<br />
Most of thefault detection schemes aremodel-based [1, 3, 4, 5, 52,61, 140,<br />
143, 238, 306, 307] and concern the dynamic relationship between actuators<br />
and vehicle behavior or thespecific input-output thruster dynamics. Amodelfree<br />
method ispresented in[43, 173]. Higher level fault detection schemes are<br />
presented in[117, 118, 146, 324]. References [42, 177, 212, 222, 279, 308]<br />
deal with hardware/software aspects of a fault detection implementation<br />
for AUVs. Neural Network and Learning techniques have also been presented<br />
[102, 113, 142, 144, 284].<br />
Concerning fault tolerant schemes, most ofthem consider athruster redundant<br />
vehicle that, after afault occurred in one of the thrusters, still is<br />
actuated in 6degrees of freedom (DOFs). Based on this assumption areallocation<br />
ofthe desired forces onthe vehicle over the working thrusters is<br />
performed [3, 4, 5, 52, 61, 232, 233, 234, 236, 251, 306, 307]. Of interest<br />
is also the study ofreconfiguration strategies if the vehicle becomes underactuated<br />
[228].<br />
Only few papers concern the experimental results of fault detection and<br />
fault tolerant schemes [3, 4, 5, 42, 52, 61, 117, 118, 212, 232, 233, 251, 306,<br />
307]; for all the above references it is worth noticing that the successfully<br />
results has been achieved with the implementation ofsimple algorithms.<br />
In Section 4.2 asmall list of failures occurred during wet operations is<br />
reported; Section 4.3 and 4.4 report the description of fault detection and<br />
tolerant strategies for underwater vehicles. Since the implementation of such<br />
strategies in areal environment isnot trivial Section 4.5 describes inmore<br />
detail some successfully experiments. Finally, the conclusions are drawn in<br />
Section 4.6.<br />
4.2 Experienced Failures<br />
In this section, asmall list of possible ROVs/AUVs’ failures is reported.