Underwater Robots - Gianluca Antonelli.pdf
Underwater Robots - Gianluca Antonelli.pdf
Underwater Robots - Gianluca Antonelli.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
88 4. Fault Detection/Tolerance Strategies for AUVs and ROVs<br />
4.5 Experiments<br />
Roby 2isaROV developed at the National Research Council-ISSIA, Italy.<br />
It has been object of several wet tests aiming at validating fault detection<br />
approaches. The horizontal motion isobtained bythe use of two fore thrusters<br />
that control the surge velocity aswell as the vehicle heading; the depth<br />
is regulated by means of two vertical thrusters. In[3, 4, 5] experiments of<br />
different fault detection schemes have been carried out by causing, on purpose,<br />
an actuator failure: one ofthe thrusters has been simply turned off. The<br />
experiments in [3, 4] have been carried out in apool, in [5] the experiments<br />
also concern acomparison between EKFs and sliding-mode observers. The<br />
latter is aresult of abilateral project with the Naval Postgraduate School,<br />
Monterey, CA.<br />
The Italian National Research Council (CNR-ISSIA) also developed the<br />
ROV ROMEO and tested, in an antarctic mission, both fault detection and<br />
tolerant schemes [52, 61]. In particular the case of flooded and blocked thrusters<br />
occurred. Inboth cases the fault has been detected and the information<br />
could be reported tothe human operator in order to activate the reconfiguration<br />
procedure. Figure 4.7 shows the expected and measured motor currents<br />
in case of flooded thruster: itcan be observed apersistent mismatching between<br />
the output ofthe model and the measured values.<br />
The vehicle Theseus manufactured by ISE Research Ltd with the Canadian<br />
Department ofNational Defence successfully handled afailure during<br />
an Arctic mission of cable laying [117, 118]. In details, the vehicle did not<br />
terminate ahoming step, probably due to poor acoustic conditions and the<br />
Fault Manager activated asafe behavior: stop under the ice and wait for further<br />
instructions. This allowed tore-establish acoustic telemetry and surface<br />
tracking and safely recover the vehicle. Notice that his fault wasn’t intentionally<br />
caused [118].<br />
The vehicle ODIN, anAUV developed at the Autonomous Systems Laboratory<br />
(ASL) of the University ofHawaii, HI, USA, has been used for several<br />
experiments. In [306, 307] the fault detection and tolerant schemes are experimentally<br />
validated. The thruster fault hasbeen tested by zeroing the output<br />
voltagebymeans of software, the fault detection schemeidentified the trouble<br />
and correctly reconfigured the force allocation byproperly modifying of the<br />
TCM. The fault tolerant scheme with respect to depth sensor fault has also<br />
been tested by zeroing the sensor reading and verifying that the algorithm,<br />
after aprogrammed time of 1s,correctly switched on the other sensor. While<br />
the theory has been developed for a6-DOFs vehicle, the experiments results<br />
only present the vehicle depth.<br />
The same vehicle has been used to validate the fault tolerant approach<br />
developed in [232, 233, 251] in 6-DOFs experiments. Different experiments<br />
have been carried out by zeroing the voltage onone or two thrusters simultaneously<br />
that, however, did not cause the vehicle becoming under-actuated.<br />
The implemented control law isbased onanidentified reduced ODIN model