06.02.2013 Views

In Pursuit of the Gene

In Pursuit of the Gene

In Pursuit of the Gene

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SEX CHROMOSOMES © 171<br />

Not only had Stevens independently discovered a <strong>the</strong>ory that was strikingly<br />

like Wilson’s idiochromosome <strong>the</strong>ory, but she had provided a crucial<br />

piece <strong>of</strong> confirming evidence that Wilson had lacked, and immediately after<br />

receiving her manuscript he devoted himself to an extended review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

cytological slides that were <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> claim that males in Anasa contained<br />

an even number <strong>of</strong> chromosomes. 19 Although he did not directly acknowledge<br />

that he had read her results and that <strong>the</strong>y had influenced his<br />

thinking, Wilson did add a second footnote acknowledging Stevens’s independent<br />

discovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>re were two types <strong>of</strong> sperm distinguished<br />

by <strong>the</strong> presence or absence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> small chromosome, as well as<br />

what he referred to as “<strong>the</strong> significant fact” that <strong>the</strong> small chromosome was<br />

found in all <strong>the</strong> somatic cells <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> male, while <strong>the</strong> female somatic cells<br />

contained only matched pairs <strong>of</strong> larger chromosomes. 20<br />

<strong>In</strong> October 1905, Morgan wrote Driesch that Wilson’s new findings<br />

“make it look at first sight as though <strong>the</strong> chromosomes were <strong>the</strong> thing.”<br />

But upon reflection he had realized that <strong>the</strong> logic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paper “lands you<br />

in an absurdity.” 21 Though he did not spell out <strong>the</strong> details, Morgan had indeed<br />

discovered a flaw in Wilson’s argument that followed from his assumption<br />

that sex chromosomes conferred specific male and female qualities.<br />

22 When he realized <strong>the</strong> flaw in Wilson’s <strong>the</strong>ory, Morgan continued, he<br />

had felt a great relief. Once again comfortable in his conviction that chromosomes<br />

were not <strong>the</strong> sine qua non, Morgan argued that <strong>the</strong> simplest way<br />

to account for <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>re were two kinds <strong>of</strong> sperm “was to assume<br />

that <strong>the</strong>re were two kinds <strong>of</strong> protoplasm.” 23<br />

<strong>In</strong> <strong>the</strong> meantime, however, Morgan had forged ahead with his own<br />

study <strong>of</strong> sex determination on a different track. Already in <strong>the</strong> spring <strong>of</strong><br />

1905, Morgan had begun collecting various species <strong>of</strong> an aphid-like insect<br />

group known as <strong>the</strong> Phylloxera. As was <strong>the</strong> case with aphids, a colony was begun<br />

by a single insect, which hatched from a winter egg. This “stem<br />

mo<strong>the</strong>r” <strong>the</strong>n reproduced asexually, giving rise to a generation <strong>of</strong> winged<br />

migrants, also par<strong>the</strong>nogenetic, that laid male and female eggs. Finally, <strong>the</strong><br />

union <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resulting male and female insects gave rise once again to a<br />

winter egg, out <strong>of</strong> which would hatch a new par<strong>the</strong>nogenetic stem mo<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong> following spring. But what excited Morgan about <strong>the</strong> phylloxerans,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!