06.02.2013 Views

In Pursuit of the Gene

In Pursuit of the Gene

In Pursuit of the Gene

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

186 ¨ THE FLY ROOM<br />

sity worked toge<strong>the</strong>r in an atmosphere <strong>of</strong> harmony and mutual respect to<br />

solve <strong>the</strong> great mystery <strong>of</strong> modern genetics. Sturtevant’s evocation has an<br />

almost surreal quality:<br />

This group worked as a unit. Each carried on his own experiments, but<br />

each knew exactly what <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs were doing, and each new result was<br />

freely discussed. There was little attention paid to priority or to <strong>the</strong><br />

source <strong>of</strong> new ideas or new interpretations. What mattered was to get<br />

ahead with <strong>the</strong> work. There was much to be done; <strong>the</strong>re were many new<br />

ideas to be tested, and many new experimental techniques to be developed.<br />

There can have been few times and places in scientific laboratories<br />

with such an atmosphere <strong>of</strong> excitement and with such a record <strong>of</strong> sustained<br />

enthusiasm. 2<br />

Despite Sturtevant’s bold attempt to airbrush <strong>the</strong> history, <strong>the</strong>re was<br />

something deeply troubled about <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> affairs in <strong>the</strong> Morgan lab. A<br />

few years before his death in 1967, Muller granted an interview to Columbia<br />

sociologist Harriet Zuckerman on <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> collaboration in science,<br />

during which he made it clear that he believed Morgan to be guilty <strong>of</strong> a serious<br />

breach <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional ethics in <strong>the</strong> fly room, and that it was his example<br />

that led to problems among <strong>the</strong> students. 3 As he explained it, “What<br />

happened in this case, it seems to me, is that <strong>the</strong> major man—if I may<br />

speak out—stole from <strong>the</strong> younger men, and <strong>the</strong>n some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> young<br />

men stole from each o<strong>the</strong>r and were able to get away with it.” After <strong>the</strong><br />

first announcement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new chromosome <strong>the</strong>ory in <strong>the</strong> 1915 textbook<br />

The Mechanism <strong>of</strong> Mendelian Heredity, which was coauthored by Morgan,<br />

Sturtevant, Muller, and Bridges, Morgan attempted to take credit for <strong>the</strong><br />

work. <strong>In</strong> <strong>the</strong> highly prestigious Vanuxem Lectures given at Princeton in<br />

1915 and 1916, which were published as a book, Morgan made little reference<br />

to <strong>the</strong> participation <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, presenting <strong>the</strong> new developments<br />

as if <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>the</strong> natural outgrowth <strong>of</strong> his early work without<br />

making any explicit mention <strong>of</strong> who had formulated <strong>the</strong> ideas and <strong>the</strong> experiments<br />

to test <strong>the</strong>m. 4 <strong>In</strong> 1919 Morgan wrote a second textbook, The Physical<br />

Basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>In</strong>heritance, but this time he wrote <strong>the</strong> book entirely under his own<br />

name. The second book was so similar to <strong>the</strong> original and brought out so<br />

soon after it (in 1919), that Holt and Co., <strong>the</strong> original publisher, considered

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!