06.02.2013 Views

In Pursuit of the Gene

In Pursuit of the Gene

In Pursuit of the Gene

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18 ¨ VIVA PANGENESIS<br />

that posed <strong>the</strong> threat. “Well, my labor has not been in vain,” Galton concludes<br />

on an upbeat note, “it is something to have established <strong>the</strong> fact that<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are no hyenas in <strong>the</strong> plain, and I think I see my way to a good position<br />

for a look out for leopards among <strong>the</strong> branches <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trees. <strong>In</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

meantime, Viva Pangenesis,” wrote Galton, acknowledging for <strong>the</strong> first<br />

time that it was <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> pangenesis as Darwin had conceived it that<br />

was at stake.<br />

Although pangenesis had escaped <strong>the</strong> fatal blow, it had been badly<br />

wounded. It soon received ano<strong>the</strong>r damaging blow from Dr. Lionel Beale, a<br />

well-respected scientist, doctor, and inventor. <strong>In</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r letter to <strong>the</strong> editor<br />

<strong>of</strong> Nature, Beale praised Galton’s “numerous,” “well-devised,” “difficult,”<br />

“laborious,” and “honest” tests <strong>of</strong> Darwin’s hypo<strong>the</strong>sis. “If such a wellthought<br />

out and well-executed series <strong>of</strong> experiments had no effect,” Beale<br />

wrote, “I do not believe it possible to obtain a series <strong>of</strong> experimental results<br />

which would lead <strong>the</strong> supporters <strong>of</strong> Pangenesis to abandon <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis,”<br />

he wrote. Pangenesis was, in Beale’s estimation, based “upon <strong>the</strong> fictions <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> fancy.” 54<br />

Ever mindful <strong>of</strong> Darwin and manipulating events to his advantage,<br />

Galton hastened to disassociate himself from <strong>the</strong> critical letter and commiserated<br />

with Darwin over <strong>the</strong> rough handling he’d had, assuring him that<br />

he did not “in any way share <strong>the</strong> animus <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> letter.” 55 Thecontent<strong>of</strong><br />

Beale’s letter, with which Galton was in perfect accord, was not mentioned.<br />

But Galton showed a new self-assurance, deliberately dispelling any hope<br />

that he might be won back to <strong>the</strong> cause. “My new experiments are not<br />

hopeful—alas!” he wrote in a postscript. “I hope Pangenesis will get well<br />

discussed now.”<br />

It is a testament to Darwin’s forgiving and genial character and Galton’s<br />

deep attachment to him that <strong>the</strong>ir conflict over pangenesis did not<br />

cause a permanent rupture in <strong>the</strong>ir personal relationship. <strong>In</strong> fact, both men<br />

continued on as if nothing much had happened. Despite <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

now both agreed that <strong>the</strong> gemmules weren’t likely in <strong>the</strong> blood, and that<br />

perhaps <strong>the</strong>y ought not to have been looking for <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong>re in <strong>the</strong> first<br />

place, <strong>the</strong> blood transfusion experiments continued. It wasn’t Galton’s style<br />

to force a confrontation. <strong>In</strong>stead, he gradually and quietly withdrew. He

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!