06.02.2013 Views

In Pursuit of the Gene

In Pursuit of the Gene

In Pursuit of the Gene

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

308 ¨ NOTES TO PAGES 106–111<br />

(1900): 257–271; De Vries, “Sur la loi de disjonction des hybrids: Note de M. Hugo<br />

de Vries, présentée par M. Gaston Bonnier,” Comptes Rendues Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences (Paris)<br />

130 (1900): 845–847.<br />

2. Robin Marantz Henig, The Monk in <strong>the</strong> Garden (New York: Houghton Mifflin,<br />

2000), 179.<br />

3. C. G. Correns, “G. Mendel’s Law concerning <strong>the</strong> Behavior <strong>of</strong> Progeny <strong>of</strong> Varietal<br />

Hybrids,” trans. Leonie Kellen Piternick, in Curt Stern and Eva R. Sherwood,<br />

The Origin <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gene</strong>tics: A Mendel Source Book (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1966), 119.<br />

4. A. H. Sturtevant, A History <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gene</strong>tics (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring<br />

Harbor Laboratory Press, 2001), 25; Wilhelm Olbers Focke, Die pflanzen-mischlinge: Ein<br />

beitrag zur biologie der gewächse (Berlin: Gebrüder Borntrager, 1881). Focke’s book was<br />

<strong>the</strong> acknowledged reference on hybridization since its publication in 1881.<br />

5. Hugo de Vries, “Sur les unités des charactères spécifiques et leur application à<br />

l’étude des hybrides,” Review général de botanique 12 (1900): 271.<br />

6. Letter from Correns to Roberts, Jan. 23, 1925, in H. F. Roberts, Plant Hybridization<br />

before Mendel (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1929), 335.<br />

7. H.-J. Rheinberger, “When Did Carl Correns Read Gregor Mendel’s Paper? A<br />

Research Note,” Isis 86 (1995): 612–616.<br />

8. Beatrice Bateson, William Bateson, F.R.S. Naturalist: His Essays and Addresses Toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with a Short Account <strong>of</strong> His Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1928), 73.<br />

9. Robert Olby points out that, strictly speaking, it was possible that it was Mendel’s,<br />

not De Vries’s, paper that Bateson read on <strong>the</strong> train. Bateson would have had<br />

to have received De Vries’s Berichte paper no later than Monday, May 7, <strong>the</strong>n read it,<br />

noted <strong>the</strong> reference to Mendel, gone to <strong>the</strong> Cambridge University library to borrow<br />

<strong>the</strong> Brunn Verhandlungen for 1865, and taken it on <strong>the</strong> train (Robert Olby, “William<br />

Bateson’s <strong>In</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> Mendelism to England: A Reassessment,” British Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> History <strong>of</strong> Science 20 [1987]: 399–420).<br />

10. William Bateson, “Societies: Royal Horticultural Lecture,” Gardeners’ Chronicle 3<br />

(1900): 303, quoted in Olby, “William Bateson’s <strong>In</strong>troduction,” 401.<br />

11. Hugo de Vries to William Bateson, Oct. 18, 1900, William Bateson Manuscripts,<br />

micr<strong>of</strong>ilm, American Philosophical Society Library, Philadelphia (hereafter Bateson<br />

MSS), reel C, no. 15.<br />

12. Hugo de Vries to William Bateson, Oct. 25, 1900, Bateson MSS, reel C, no. 15.<br />

13. Hugo de Vries, “On Crosses with Dissimilar Heredity,” Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Royal Horticultural<br />

Society 25 (1901): 251 (translated from Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft<br />

18 [1900]: 435).<br />

14. Ibid., 254.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!