06.02.2013 Views

In Pursuit of the Gene

In Pursuit of the Gene

In Pursuit of the Gene

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

X-RAYS © 229<br />

Bateson’s plenary address to <strong>the</strong> members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AAAS in <strong>the</strong> grand<br />

Convocation Hall <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Toronto was <strong>the</strong> main event in <strong>the</strong><br />

medley <strong>of</strong> biological meetings held in Toronto during Christmas week <strong>of</strong><br />

1921. Misrepresented by reporters, Bateson’s address would be picked up by<br />

all <strong>the</strong> news media and used as a propaganda tool for William Jennings<br />

Bryan in his campaign to ban <strong>the</strong> teaching <strong>of</strong> evolution in <strong>the</strong> United<br />

States. The religious overtones in <strong>the</strong> title <strong>of</strong> his lecture, “Evolution Faith<br />

and Modern Doubts,” and <strong>the</strong> lecture’s being packed with biblical allusions,<br />

which were a staple <strong>of</strong> Bateson’s lecture style, made him a ripe target for<br />

<strong>the</strong> sensationalist press. Sensing <strong>the</strong> danger, Bateson had included an unambiguous<br />

rejoinder to those who might be tempted to misinterpret his<br />

lecture: “Let us <strong>the</strong>n proclaim in precise and unmistakable language that<br />

our faith in evolution is unshaken.”<br />

The talk itself, as Bateson recognized, had an antiquarian air about<br />

it, harkening back to arguments that Darwin himself had made sixty years<br />

earlier. Nostalgically Bateson recalled his first visit to America in 1888 when<br />

evolution had been <strong>the</strong> burning issue for any serious biologist. <strong>In</strong> that<br />

era, he recalled for <strong>the</strong> assembled crowd <strong>of</strong> scientists and journalists, “every<br />

aspiring zoologist was a embryologist” because embryology was <strong>the</strong>n believed<br />

to hold <strong>the</strong> key to understanding evolution. By <strong>the</strong> turn <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> century,<br />

Bateson continued, <strong>the</strong> old Haeckelian ideas had proved to be a dead<br />

end, and he and o<strong>the</strong>r evolution-minded biologists turned to <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong><br />

“variation and heredity,” creating <strong>the</strong> discipline that Bateson himself had<br />

dubbed genetics in 1905. “We became geneticists in <strong>the</strong> conviction that <strong>the</strong>re<br />

at least must evolutionary wisdom be found,” 30 he explained, but genetics,<br />

like embryology before it, had failed to deliver on <strong>the</strong> promise. Even with<br />

<strong>the</strong> advances <strong>of</strong> Mendelism and <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r additions provided by <strong>the</strong><br />

Drosophila workers at Columbia, biologists were no closer to understanding<br />

<strong>the</strong> “mode and processes <strong>of</strong> evolution” and to finally resolving <strong>the</strong> mystery<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> species.<br />

The following day, Bateson gave ano<strong>the</strong>r lecture, this one to <strong>the</strong> Society<br />

<strong>of</strong> Zoologists, which spelled out <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> his conversion to <strong>the</strong><br />

chromosome <strong>the</strong>ory and elaborated on his various reservations. On <strong>the</strong><br />

larger point—that genes resided in chromosomes—he did finally join <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!