10.02.2013 Views

Serengeti General Management Plan

Serengeti General Management Plan

Serengeti General Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table H.3: Community Outreach Programme Monitoring <strong>Plan</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

Target<br />

Potential impacts<br />

(Positive and<br />

Negative)<br />

Indicator<br />

H. <strong>Plan</strong> Monitoring<br />

Source of<br />

Information<br />

Objective 1: Neighbouring community and local government support for conservation<br />

strengthened<br />

1.1: Park-<br />

Increased community Incidences of poach- Protection Departcommunitycoop-<br />

awareness of SENAPA ing within SENAPA ment records<br />

eration,commu- rules and regulations<br />

nication and conflict<br />

resolution<br />

mechanisms enhanced<br />

Reduced conflict between<br />

SENAPA and<br />

surrounding communities<br />

Incidences of Parkcommunity<br />

conflict<br />

Outreach Department<br />

records<br />

Knowledge, attitudes<br />

and practices<br />

surveys (c.f. Action<br />

1.1.2)<br />

Park outreach activities Community contribu- Outreach Depart-<br />

are better targeted to tions to park outment records<br />

community priority reach activities (i.e.<br />

needs and aspirations labour or resources)<br />

1.2: Community Increased value and SENAPA SCIP con- Park accounts<br />

benefits from importance of<br />

tributions<br />

SENAPA enhanced<br />

and costs<br />

reduced<br />

SENAPA to Parkadjacent<br />

communities<br />

Income derived from<br />

economic activities<br />

linking communities<br />

Community based<br />

organisations/ Outreach<br />

Department<br />

to SENAPA<br />

records<br />

Employment of local Park accounts and<br />

people by Park Outreach Depart-<br />

stakeholders ment records<br />

Ranking of commu- Knowledge, attinity<br />

value placed on tudes and practices<br />

SENAPA against surveys (c.f. Action<br />

other community resources<br />

1.1.2)<br />

Reduced costs of wild- Incidents of human- Outreach Departlife<br />

to Park-adjacent wildlife conflicts in ment records (c.f.<br />

communities<br />

communities adjacent<br />

to the Park<br />

Action 1.2.3)<br />

Increased immigration Trends in population Direct observation<br />

into areas surrounding growth and immigra- and District records<br />

SENAPA<br />

tion in Park adjacent<br />

areas<br />

Benefits from IGAs are Number of recipients Community based<br />

unfairly captured by and beneficiaries of organisations/ Out-<br />

wealthy/ powerful schemes<br />

reach Department<br />

community members<br />

records<br />

SENAPA’s high quality Visitor satisfaction Visitor use and sat-<br />

tourism product de- and feedback isfaction surveys<br />

graded by inappropri-<br />

(c.f. Tourism Manate<br />

initiatives or activiagementProtiesgramme<br />

Action<br />

4.1.3)<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!